Error-based global optimization approach for electric motor design

This paper proposes a new global optimization approach for electric machine design problems. The algorithm uses an error function between the actual objective function, at a given computational step, and its limit value to search for the global minimum. The error function provides a good indication of how far or close the objective function approaches its ultimate solution. This method is considered to be self adaptive in a sense that the higher the error is, the larger the step size of the variables will be. This feature helps the search to escape local solutions and to reach eventually the global solution. The proposed method was tested on various typical multimodal functions and particularly applied to induction motor design optimization problems. This algorithm is very simple and easy to be implemented, yet powerful and effective as indicated by the test results.

[1]  H. Zimmermann Towards global optimization 2: L.C.W. DIXON and G.P. SZEGÖ (eds.) North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, viii + 364 pages, US $ 44.50, Dfl. 100,-. , 1979 .

[2]  Arifur Rahman,et al.  Three-phase induction motor design optimization using the modified Hooke-Jeeves method , 1990 .

[3]  N. H. Fetih,et al.  Induction Motor Optimum Design, Including Active Power Loss Effect , 1986, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[4]  M. Nurdin,et al.  Synthesis of squirrel cage motors: a key to optimization , 1991 .

[5]  O. W. Andersen Optimum Design of Electrical Machines , 1967 .

[6]  J. Appelbaum,et al.  Optimization of Three-Phase Induction Motor Design Part I: Formulation of the Optimization Technique , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  B. G. Desai,et al.  Optimization Of Pplyphase Induction Motor Design: A Nonlinear Programming Approach , 1971 .

[8]  R. S. Colby,et al.  Measured efficiency of high efficiency and standard induction motors , 1990, Conference Record of the 1990 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[9]  G. F. Uler,et al.  Design optimization of electrical machines using genetic algorithms , 1995 .

[10]  J. Appelbaum,et al.  Optimization of Three-Phase Induction Motor Design. Part II: The Efficiency and Cost of an Optimal Design , 1987, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  Francesco Profumo,et al.  Analysis of the magnetic material quality influence on induction motors energetic performance , 1986 .

[12]  R. B. Patil,et al.  SALO: COMBINING SIMULATED ANNEALING AND LOCAL OPTIMIZATION FOR EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION , 1996 .

[13]  Aimo A. Törn,et al.  Global Optimization , 1999, Science.

[14]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Comparison between genetic and gradient-based optimization algorithms for solving electromagnetics problems , 1995 .

[15]  K. Venkatesan,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH DIRECT AND INDIRECT SEARCH METHODS APPLIED TO CAGE INDUCTION MOTOR DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1979 .

[16]  Bhim Singh,et al.  Experience in Design Optimization of Induction Motor Using 'SUMT' Algorithm , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[17]  B. G. Desai,et al.  A Comparative Study of Minimization Techniques for Optimization of Induction Motor Design , 1973 .