“Same-patient processing” for multiple cardiac SPECT studies. 2. Improving quantification repeatability

ObjectivesThis paper investigates the ability of grouped quantification (an expression of the same-patient processing approach, or SPP) to improve repeatability of measurements in patients with multiple SPECT studies, and evaluates its performance compared to standard quantification in a population of 100 patients undergoing rest, stress, gated rest, and gated stress SPECT MPI. All acquisitions were performed twice, back-to-back, for a total of 800 image datasets (8 per patient).MethodsEach dataset was automatically processed (a) independently, using standard quantitative software, and (b) as a group, together with the other 7 datasets belonging to the same patient, using an SPP-modified version of the software that registered the images to one another using a downhill simplex algorithm for the search of optimal translation, rotation, and scaling parameters.ResultsOverall, grouped quantification resulted in significantly lower differences between repeated measurements of stress ungated volumes (1.40 ± 2.76 mL vs 3.33 ± 5.06 mL, P < .05), end-diastolic volumes (1.78 ± 2.78 vs 3.49 ± 5.35 mL, P < .05), end-systolic volumes (1.17 ± 1.96 vs 2.44 ± 3.35 mL, P < .05), and LVEFs (−0.45 ± 2.29% vs −1.16 ± 3.30%, P < .05). Additionally, grouped quantification produced better repeatability (lower repeatability coefficients) for stress and rest ungated volumes (5.4 vs 9.9 and 5.2 vs 13.1, respectively), stress TPD (2.6 vs 3.6), stress and rest end-diastolic volumes (5.5 vs 10.5 and 7.2 vs 14.7, respectively), stress and rest end-systolic volumes (3.8 vs 6.6 and 5.3 vs 10.3, respectively), stress and rest LVEFs (4.5 vs 6.5 and 4.7 vs 8.2, respectively), and rest total motion deficit (5.6 vs 9.6).ConclusionIt is possible to improve the repeatability of quantitative measurements of parameters of myocardial perfusion and function derived from SPECT MPI studies of a same patient by group processing of image datasets belonging to that patient. This application of the same-patient processing approach is an extension of the “paired processing” technique already described by our group, and can be performed in automated fashion through incorporation in the quantitative algorithm.

[1]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  Mouaz Al-Mallah,et al.  ASNC IMAGING GUIDELINES FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES Single photon-emission computed tomography , 2010 .

[3]  Benjamin C. Lee,et al.  Corridor4DM: The Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  D. Berman,et al.  Serial myocardial perfusion imaging: defining a significant change and targeting management decisions. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Automatic and visual reproducibility of perfusion and function measures for myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  D. Berman,et al.  Tracking a therapeutic response: How reliable are serial measurements of LV perfusion and function? , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  D. Berman,et al.  Repeatability of automatic left ventricular cavity volume measurements from myocardial perfusion SPECT , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  D. Berman,et al.  “Same-Patient Processing” for multiple cardiac SPECT studies. 1. Improving LV segmentation accuracy , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[9]  P J Slomka,et al.  Three-dimensional demarcation of perfusion zones corresponding to specific coronary arteries: application for automated interpretation of myocardial SPECT. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  P. Soman,et al.  A prospective evaluation of the repeatability of left ventricular ejection fraction measurement by gated SPECT , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  Guido Germano,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormality on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is more reproducible than expert visual analysis , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  D. Berman,et al.  Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  Guido Germano,et al.  Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Russell D Folks,et al.  The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: The Emory approach , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Myocardial perfusion and function single photon emission computed tomography , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: The Cedars-Sinai approach , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  T. Ruddy,et al.  Half-Time SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Attenuation Correction , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  P J Slomka,et al.  Automated alignment and sizing of myocardial stress and rest scans to three-dimensional normal templates using an image registration algorithm. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  G Germano,et al.  Operator-less processing of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R. Hendel,et al.  Regadenoson induces comparable left ventricular perfusion defects as adenosine: a quantitative analysis from the ADVANCE MPI 2 trial. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[22]  A. Movahed,et al.  Gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Imaging: Current Status and Limitations , 2009 .