Implementing what we know about learning in a middle-school curriculum for widespread dissemination: the project-based inquiry science (PBIS) story

Project-Based Inquiry Science (PBIS) is a comprehensive technology-enhanced science curriculum for grades 6 through 8 (ages 12-14), designed based on foundations in the learning sciences. Most of its units were developed during the 1990's at Georgia Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, and University of Michigan. Over the past five years, researchers at these universities (and others) have been working to pull the units together into a curriculum that can be disseminated nationally (in the U.S.). During the last two years, we have been working closely with the publishing company, It's About Time, to bring the curriculum to publication. We present the research foundations of PBIS along with the pragmatics of incorporating individual units into an integrated curriculum appropriate that addresses the diverse requirements of 50 states while also addressing the diverse needs of learners.

[1]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[2]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .

[3]  D. Holland.  Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds , 1998 .

[4]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[5]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[6]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research , 1996 .

[7]  David E. Kanter,et al.  Learning content using complex data in project‐based science: An example from high school biology in urban classrooms , 2006 .

[8]  J. Greeno.  Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer , 2006 .

[9]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[10]  C. Atman,et al.  How people learn. , 1985, Hospital topics.

[11]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[12]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[13]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning , 1994 .

[14]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade , 1998 .

[15]  M. Scardamalia.  Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[16]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Liberal education in a knowledge society , 2002 .

[17]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[20]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[21]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[23]  Janet L Kolodner,et al.  Promoting Transfer through Case-Based Reasoning: Rituals and Practices in the Learning by Design Classroom and Evidence of Transfer , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[24]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .