论文信息 - The ACM SIGCOMM 2009 technical program committee process

The ACM SIGCOMM 2009 technical program committee process

Selecting a technical program for a conference, and running the process so that decisions are well received by authors and participants, is a challenging task. We report our experience in running the SIGCOMM 2009 Technical Program Committee (TPC). The purpose of this article is to document the process that we followed, and discuss it critically. This should let authors get a better understanding of what led to the final acceptance or rejection of their work, and hopefully allow colleagues in charge of similar tasks make use of our experience.

Konstantina Papagiannaki | Luigi Rizzo

[1] John R. Douceur. Paper rating vs. paper ranking , 2008, OPSR.

[2] Eddie Kohler. Hot Crap! , 2008, WOWCS.

[3] Mischa Schwartz,et al. ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review , 2001, CCRV.

[4] Nick McKeown,et al. ViewpointScaling the academic publication process to internet scale , 2009, CACM.

[5] Graham Cormode. How NOT to review a paper: the tools and techniques of the adversarial reviewer , 2009, SGMD.

[6] Paul Francis. Thoughts on Improving Review Quality , 2008, WOWCS.

[7] Alan Jay Smith,et al. The task of the referee , 1990, Computer.

[8] Thomas E. Anderson,et al. Towards a Model of Computer Systems Research , 2008, WOWCS.

[9] Jeffrey C. Mogul,et al. WOWCS: the workshop on organizing workshops, conferences, and symposia for computer systems , 2009, OPSR.