Synchronous Versus Asynchronous CMC and Transfer to Japanese Oral Performance

This study investigated the effects of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on the development of linguistic features of learners' speech in Japanese. Using learners from fourth-semester Japanese classes, the following research questions were examined: (a) Does CMC have positive effects on the development of oral proficiency among learners of Japanese? and (b) Are there any relationships between language use in CMC and the development of oral skills? The participants were divided into three groups: two CMC groups (synchronous and asynchronous) and one face-to-face group. They engaged in weekly discussions over the course of a semester, and the gain scores in terms of language output, linguistic complexity, accuracy, and cohesive devices between the pre-test and the post-test were compared. In addition, the relationship between language use in both types of CMC and the gain scores on the oral tests was examined, using Pearson correlation coefficients. The present study did not find any significant differences among gains in the linguistic indices. However, it found that CMC language use was correlated positively with the gain scores in several indices, and a relationship between CMC language use and the development of oral proficiency was observed.

[1]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[2]  S. Herring.  Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[3]  Robert J. Blake,et al.  Bimodal CMC: The Glue of Language Learning at a Distance. , 2013 .

[4]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[5]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice , 2000 .

[6]  Peter Skehan,et al.  The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[7]  Kevin Jepson,et al.  Conversations--and Negotiated Interaction--in Text and Voice Chat Rooms. , 2005 .

[8]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[9]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion in the Foreign Language Classroom: Conversation in Slow Motion , 1992 .

[10]  Sandra J. Sovignon,et al.  Computer-mediated Communication: Texts and Strategies , 2013 .

[11]  Norbert Schmitt,et al.  Tracking the Incremental Acquisition of Second Language Vocabulary: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[12]  Julie M. Sykes,et al.  Synchronous CMC and Pragmatic Development: Effects of Oral and Written Chat , 2013 .

[13]  Richard G. Kern.  Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production , 1995 .

[14]  Margaret Healy Beauvois,et al.  E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion , 1994, Comput. Humanit..

[15]  Robert Sanders.  A Comparison of Chat Room Productivity: In-class Versus Out-of-class , 2013 .

[16]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Developing L2 Oral Proficiency Through Synchronous CMC: Output, Working Memory, and Interlanguage Development. , 2013 .

[17]  Alan Tonkyn,et al.  Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons , 2000 .

[18]  Keiko Kitade,et al.  L2 Learners' Discourse and SLA Theories in CMC: Collaborative Interaction in Internet Chat , 2000 .

[19]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Noticing and Text-Based Chat , 2006 .

[20]  Z. Abrams.  Flaming in CMC: Prometheus' Fire or Inferno's? , 2013 .

[21]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Multilingual Matters 93. , 1993 .

[22]  Zsuzsanna I. Abrams.  Computer-mediated communication and group journals: expanding the repertoire of participant roles , 2001 .

[23]  Karen E. Breiner-Sanders,et al.  ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking: Revised 1999 , 2000 .

[24]  M. Shekary,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning and Noticing in Text‐Based Online Chat , 2006 .

[25]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[26]  Lourdes Ortega,et al.  Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion , 1997 .

[27]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[28]  Etsuko Toyoda,et al.  Categorization of Text Chat Communication between Learners and Native Speakers of Japanese. , 2002 .

[29]  J. Scott Payne,et al.  SYNCHRONOUS CMC, WORKING MEMORY, AND L2 ORAL PROFICIENCY DEVELOPMENT , 2005 .

[30]  Nancy Sullivan,et al.  A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom , 1996 .

[31]  Robert J. Blake,et al.  Computer Mediated Communication: A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage , 2000 .

[32]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Discourse Functions and Syntactic Complexity in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication , 2000 .

[33]  Ilona Vandergriff.  Negotiating Common Ground in Computer-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Discussions , 2006 .

[34]  Keiko Kitade,et al.  The Negotiation Model in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication (CMC): Negotiation in Task-based Email Exchanges , 2013 .

[35]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Conversations in Slow Motion: Computer-Mediated Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom. , 1998 .

[36]  Zsuzsanna I. Abrams,et al.  The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous CMC on Oral Performance in German , 2003 .

[37]  Orlando R. Kelm.  The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language Instruction: A Preliminary Report , 1992 .

[38]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Network-based Language Teaching: On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study , 2000 .

[39]  Claudia R. Kost.  An investigation of the effects of synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on interlanguage development in beginning learners of German: Accuracy, proficiency, and communication strategies , 2004 .

[40]  Simeon Yates,et al.  Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing : A corpus based study , 1996 .

[41]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[42]  Mark Darhower.  Interactional Features of Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in the Intermediate L2 Class: A Sociocultural Case Study , 2013 .

[43]  Olaf Böhlke.  A Comparison of Students Participation Levels by Group Size and Language Stages during Chatroom and Face-to-Face Discussions in German. , 2013 .

[44]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[45]  Luisa C. Perez.  Foreign Language Productivity in Synchronous versus Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 2013 .

[46]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .