Handheld Co-Axial Bioprinting: Application to in situ surgical cartilage repair

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is driving major innovations in the area of cartilage tissue engineering. Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting necessitates a phase change from a liquid bioink to a semi-solid crosslinked network achieved by a photo-initiated free radical polymerization reaction that is known to be cytotoxic. Therefore, the choice of the photocuring conditions has to be carefully addressed to generate a structure stiff enough to withstand the forces phisiologically applied on articular cartilage, while ensuring adequate cell survival for functional chondral repair. We recently developed a handheld 3D printer called “Biopen”. To progress towards translating this freeform biofabrication tool into clinical practice, we aimed to define the ideal bioprinting conditions that would deliver a scaffold with high cell viability and structural stiffness relevant for chondral repair. To fulfill those criteria, free radical cytotoxicity was confined by a co-axial Core/Shell separation. This system allowed the generation of Core/Shell GelMa/HAMa bioscaffolds with stiffness of 200KPa, achieved after only 10 seconds of exposure to 700 mW/cm2 of 365 nm UV-A, containing >90% viable stem cells that retained proliferative capacity. Overall, the Core/Shell handheld 3D bioprinting strategy enabled rapid generation of high modulus bioscaffolds with high cell viability, with potential for in situ surgical cartilage engineering.

[1]  Jos Malda,et al.  Gelatin-Methacryloyl Hydrogels: Towards Biofabrication-Based Tissue Repair. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[2]  Gordon G Wallace,et al.  Bio-ink for on-demand printing of living cells. , 2013, Biomaterials science.

[3]  Aleksandr Ovsianikov,et al.  Development of the Biopen : a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site , 2016 .

[4]  M. Adams.  The mechanical environment of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. , 2006, Biorheology.

[5]  M. Woodruff,et al.  Tailoring Hydrogel Viscoelasticity with Physical and Chemical Crosslinking , 2015 .

[6]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[9]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Bioprinting the Cancer Microenvironment. , 2016, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[10]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Bioprinting towards Physiologically Relevant Tissue Models for Pharmaceutics. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  J. Burdick,et al.  Cellular Encapsulation in 3D Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering , 2009, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[12]  Wojciech Święszkowski,et al.  3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels for in vitro neocartilage formation , 2016, Biofabrication.

[13]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Bioprinting Toward Organ Fabrication: Challenges and Future Trends , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Scott A. Guelcher,et al.  3D Printing of Tissue Engineered Constructs for In Vitro Modeling of Disease Progression and Drug Screening , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Microfluidic Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs Using Low‐Viscosity Bioink , 2016, Advanced materials.

[16]  Wim E Hennink,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication , 2013, Advanced materials.

[17]  A. Lode,et al.  A versatile method for combining different biopolymers in a core/shell fashion by 3D plotting to achieve mechanically robust constructs , 2016, Biofabrication.

[18]  Peter Dubruel,et al.  A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[19]  Mark W. Tibbitt,et al.  Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  Wim E Hennink,et al.  The effect of photopolymerization on stem cells embedded in hydrogels. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[21]  R. Marchant,et al.  Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds , 2011, Expert review of medical devices.

[22]  Gordon G. Wallace,et al.  Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells , 2013, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[23]  Fabien Guillemot,et al.  Cell patterning technologies for organotypic tissue fabrication. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  P. Dubruel,et al.  The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[25]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[26]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[27]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl–based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[28]  Peter F. M. Choong,et al.  Chondrogenesis of Infrapatellar Fat Pad Derived Adipose Stem Cells in 3D Printed Chitosan Scaffold , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  Jos Malda,et al.  Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[30]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Paul N Manson,et al.  Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[32]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. , 2013, Macromolecular bioscience.