Measuring tactile cues at the fingerpad for object compliances harder and softer than the skin

Distinguishing an object's compliance, into percepts of "softness" and "hardness," is crucial to our ability to grasp and manipulate it. Biomechanical cues at the skin's surface such as contact area and force rate have been thought to help encode compliance. However, no one has directly measured contact area with compliant materials, and few studies have considered compliances softer than the fingerpad. Herein, we developed a novel method to precisely measure the area in contact between compliant stimuli and the fingerpad, at given levels of force and displacement. To determine the method's robustness, we conducted psychophysical and biomechanical experiments with human subjects. The results indicate that cues including contact area at stimulus peak force of 3 Newtons, force rate over stimulus movement and at peak force, displacement and/or time to reach peak force may help in discriminating compliances while the directional spread of contact area is less important. Between softer and harder compliances, some cues were slightly more evident, though not yet definitively. Based upon the method's utility, the next step is to conduct broader experiments to distill the mixture of cues that encode compliance. The importance of such work lies in building haptic displays, for example, to render virtual tissues.

[1]  C A Moskaluk,et al.  Construct validity in a high-fidelity prostate exam simulator , 2012, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Subjective Hardness of Compliant Materials , 1964 .

[3]  Lukas Kaim,et al.  Exploratory Strategies in Haptic Softness Discrimination Are Tuned to Achieve High Levels of Task Performance , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[4]  Ellen J Bass,et al.  Characterizing the range of simulated prostate abnormalities palpable by digital rectal examination. , 2010, Cancer epidemiology.

[5]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Dynamics of fingertip contact during the onset of tangential slip , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  Rate-hardness: a new performance metric for haptic interfaces , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Rendering Softness: Integration of Kinesthetic and Cutaneous Information in a Haptic Device , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[8]  Gregory J. Gerling,et al.  Material characterization of ex vivo prostate tissue via spherical indentation in the clinic. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  R. LaMotte,et al.  Magnitude estimation of softness , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[11]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Haptic discrimination of softness in teleoperation: the role of the contact area spread rate , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..