Customization, information provision and choice: what are we willing to give up for personal service?

Consumers are being increasingly asked to provide personal information in exchange for individually tailored product/service offerings. If there are discrepancies between the personal information disclosed (quality and completeness) and the actual profile of the individual, the resulting customized offer will not maich the expected offer. The paper uses several theories to develop a framework to understand the disclosure/customization process and the valuation of information. Self-concept theory suggests that an individal's self-perception influences his/her behavior and attitudes regarding a variety of issues including how and what personal information is provided. Attribution theory can be used to explain how customization-successes and failures may be perceived by the consumer, in light of information incompleteness and/or inaccuracy of disclosure. An application of the framework is illustrated with an example of an online dating service.

[1]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring processes , 1979 .

[2]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[3]  Harold H. Kassarjian,et al.  Perspectives in consumer behavior , 1973 .

[4]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Handbook of Consumer Behavior , 1990 .

[5]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  The self in social psychology , 1980 .

[6]  M. Joseph Sirgy,et al.  Self-Image/Product-Image Congruence Models: Testing Selected Models , 1982 .

[7]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users' Attitudes About Online Privacy , 1999, ArXiv.

[8]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Theories of attitude change , 1967 .

[9]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Building consumer trust online , 1999, CACM.

[10]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Value-Expressive versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal , 1991 .

[11]  George R. Milne,et al.  Trust and Concern in Consumers’ Perceptions of Marketing Information Management Practices , 1999 .

[12]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  The self in social psychology. , 1999 .

[13]  J. Phelps,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2000 .

[14]  K. Sheehan,et al.  Dimensions of Privacy Concern among Online Consumers , 2000 .

[15]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Children's Susceptibility to Peer Group Purchase Influence: an Exploratory Investigation , 1993 .

[16]  Marian S. Harris,et al.  Self-disclosure reciprocity, liking and the deviant , 1973 .

[17]  V. Folkes.  Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions , 1988 .

[18]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters , 2000 .

[19]  T. J. Crawford,et al.  Theories of attitude change and the "beyond family planning" debate: the case for the persuasion approach in population policy. , 1974, Family planning resume.

[20]  J. Aaker,et al.  The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion , 1999 .

[21]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[22]  B. Weiner.  Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior , 2000 .

[23]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[24]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .