Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

We examined water column temperature time series profiles for several years at two locations in a single kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) forest to characterize the alongshore variability of the nutrient climate that giant kelp is exposed to and compare it to the response of giant kelp. The differences in nutrient climate are due to differential alongshore vertical variations in temperature, a well-established proxy of nitrate, due to the topographically induced internal wave dynamics within the kelp forest. We observed the greatest temperature variability during summer and most of this variability occurred near the surface. The 14.5 � C isotherm, indicating the presence of nitrate, ranged the entire vertical extent of the water column, and was shallowest during the winter and in the southern portion of the kelp forest. Predicted water column integrated nitrate varies from 0 mmol NO3 /m 2 to 431 mmol NO3 /m 2 yielding a time series daily average of 0.12 gN/m 2 day (North La Jolla) and 0.18 gN/m 2 day (South La Jolla). Redfield conversion of these values puts the time series daily average for carbon production (upper limit) between 0.8 and 1.2 gC/m 2 day for the north and south parts of the bed respectively, and shows considerable variation at several time scales. Giant kelp in the southern portion of the forest exhibited greater stipe densities (a proxy for kelp production) than individuals in the northern portion, corresponding with the alongshore nutrient climate variability. The depth of the nutricline varied by up to 10 m over time scales as short as hours. Variability was greatest at diurnal and semi-diurnal frequencies, with shallower water column depths showing greatest variability. These depth-specific variations in temperature and nutrient exposure may have biologically important consequences for M. pyrifera especially during low nutrient seasons.

[1]  K. Schmitz.  Long Distance Transport in Macrocystis integrifolia: I. Translocation of C-labeled Assimilates. , 1979, Plant physiology.

[2]  W. North,et al.  Fish Bulletin 139. Utilization of Kelp-Bed Resources in Southern California , 1968 .

[3]  D. Siegel,et al.  Scaling giant kelp field measurements to regional scales using satellite observations , 2010 .

[4]  T. A. Dean,et al.  Growth of juvenile Macrocystis pyrifera (Laminariales) in relation to environmental factors , 1984 .

[5]  W. N. Wheeler,et al.  Seasonal nitrate physiology of Macrocystis integrifolia Bory , 1984 .

[6]  P. Dayton,et al.  The response of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) in southern California to low‐frequency climate forcing , 2010 .

[7]  V. A. Gerard.  In situ rates of nitrate uptake by giant kelp, Macrocystis Pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh: Tissue differences, environmental effects, and predictions of nitrogen-limited growth , 1982 .

[8]  Tim Gerrodette,et al.  Patch Dynamics and Stability of Some California Kelp Communities , 1984 .

[9]  D. Roemmich.  Ocean Warming and Sea Level Rise Along the Southwest U.S. Coast , 1992, Science.

[10]  J. Witman,et al.  The relationship between regional and local species diversity in marine benthic communities: a global perspective. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  L. Ladah.  The shoaling of nutrient-enriched subsurface waters as a mechanism to sustain primary productivity off Central Baja California during El Niño winters , 2003 .

[12]  J. Kremer,et al.  VARIATION IN NITROGEN PHYSIOLOGY AND GROWTH AMONG GEOGRAPHICALLY ISOLATED POPULATIONS OF THE GIANT KELP, MACROCYSTIS PYRIFERA (PHAEOPHYTA) 1 , 1991 .

[13]  C. Hurd,et al.  Conditional mutualism between the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera and colonial epifauna , 2005 .

[14]  P. Wheeler,et al.  AMMONIUN AND NITRATE UPTAKE BY THE MARINE MACROPHYTES HYPNEA MUSVUFORMIS (RHODOPHYTA) AND MACROCYSTIS PYRIFERA (PHAEOPHYTA) 1, 2 , 1978 .

[15]  M. Tegner,et al.  Storm Wave Induced Mortality of Giant Kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, in Southern , 1989 .

[16]  G. Jackson.  Currents in the high drag environment of a coastal kelp stand off California , 1997 .

[17]  Libe Washburn,et al.  Sub‐mesoscale coastal eddies observed by high frequency radar: A new mechanism for delivering nutrients to kelp forests in the Southern California Bight , 2005 .

[18]  V. A. Gerard.  Photosynthetic characteristics of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) determined in situ , 1986 .

[19]  U. Send,et al.  Amplification of hypoxic and acidic events by La Niña conditions on the continental shelf off California , 2011 .

[20]  George A. Jackson,et al.  Effect of a kelp forest on coastal currents , 1983 .

[21]  S. Dupont,et al.  Marine ecological genomics: when genomics meets marine ecology , 2007 .

[22]  M. Tegner,et al.  Sea urchins, El Ninos, and the long term stability of Southern California kelp forest communities , 1991 .

[23]  N. Bond,et al.  Climate forcing and the California Current ecosystem , 2011 .

[24]  W. Hamner,et al.  Topographically Controlled Fronts in the Ocean and Their Biological Influence , 1988, Science.

[25]  M. Tegner,et al.  Large-scale, low-frequency oceanographic effects on kelp forest succession: a tale of two cohorts , 1997 .

[26]  V. A. Gerard.  Growth and utilization of internal nitrogen reserves by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in a low-nitrogen environment , 1982 .

[27]  J. Pearse,et al.  Production of the giant kelp, Macrocystis, estimated by in situ incorporation of 14C in polyethylene bags1 , 1973 .

[28]  G. Hofmann,et al.  Genomics-enabled research in marine ecology: challenges, risks and pay-offs , 2007 .

[29]  A Bakun,et al.  Global Climate Change and Intensification of Coastal Ocean Upwelling , 1990, Science.

[30]  S. Manley.  COMPOSITION OF SIEVE TUBE SAP FROM MACROCYSTIS PYRIFERA (PHAEOPHYTA) WITH EMPHASIS ON THE INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS 1 , 1983 .

[31]  J. Kremer,et al.  In Situ Growth and Chemical Composition of the Giant Kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera: Response to Temporal Changes in Ambient Nutrient Availability , 1986 .

[32]  W. North.  The biology of giant kelp beds (Macrocystis) in California , 1971 .

[33]  Robert S. Steneck,et al.  Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[34]  Johanna H. Rosman,et al.  Currents and turbulence within a kelp forest (Macrocystis pyrifera): Insights from a dynamically scaled laboratory model , 2010 .

[35]  Andrew Rassweiler,et al.  Density derived estimates of standing crop and net primary production in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera , 2009, Marine biology.

[36]  C. Lennert‐Cody,et al.  Marine reserve design: optimal size, habitats, species affinities, diversity, and ocean microclimate. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  E. McPhee‐Shaw,et al.  Diurnal-period internal waves near point conception, California , 2009 .

[38]  Jessica Pineda.  Predictable Upwelling and the Shoreward Transport of Planktonic Larvae by Internal Tidal Bores , 1991, Science.

[39]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  QUANTIFYING SCALE IN ECOLOGY: LESSONS FROM AWAVE-SWEPT SHORE , 2004 .

[40]  N. Diffenbaugh,et al.  Could CO2-induced land-cover feedbacks alter near-shore upwelling regimes? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. Sykes.  Anatomy and Histology of Macrocystis pyrifera and Laminaria saccharina , 1908 .

[42]  P. Dayton,et al.  Ecology of Kelp Communities , 1985 .

[43]  Daniel Kamykowski,et al.  Predicting plant nutrient concentrations from temperature and sigma-t in the upper kilometer of the world ocean , 1986 .

[44]  J. Pineda.  Circulation and larval distribution in internal tidal bore warm fronts , 1999 .

[45]  M. Tegner,et al.  TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SCALES OF KELP DEMOGRAPHY: THE ROLE OF OCEANOGRAPHIC CLIMATE , 1999 .

[46]  M. Tegner,et al.  SLIDING BASELINES, GHOSTS, AND REDUCED EXPECTATIONS IN KELP FOREST COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[47]  John L. Largier,et al.  The green ribbon: Multiscale physical control of phytoplankton productivity and community structure over a narrow continental shelf , 2011 .

[48]  G. Jackson.  Nutrients and production of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off southern California1 , 1977 .

[49]  Susan L. Williams,et al.  Differences in growth, morphology and tissue carbon and nitrogen of Macrocystis pyrifera within and at the outer edge of a giant kelp forest in California, USA , 2009 .

[50]  D. Robledo,et al.  Effect of Nutrient Availability on Macrocystis pyrifera Recruitment and Survival near Its Southern Limit off Baja California , 2001 .

[51]  Nancy Knowlton,et al.  Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. , 2012, Annual review of marine science.

[52]  A. Chapman,et al.  Ecotypic differentiation of Laminaria longicruris in relation to seawater nitrate concentration , 1983 .

[53]  Kristin L. Riser,et al.  Remotely forced nearshore upwelling in Southern California , 2003 .

[54]  M. Lavín,et al.  Nitrogen uptake and growth by the opportunistic macroalga Ulva lactuca (Linnaeus) during the internal tide , 2011 .

[55]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  Mechanisms for nutrient delivery to the inner shelf: Observations from the Santa Barbara Channel , 2007 .