Reexploring Transport Geography and Networks: A Case Study of Container Shipments to the West Coast of the United States

After a meteoric rise to prominence in the 1990s, the practice of conceptualizing the relationships between places in terms of networks has recently come under fire within economic geography. Its critics claim that networks are ‘fuzzy’, ‘anemic’, and ‘overendowed’. Others have criticized the network approach for its insensitivity to the way in which power is transmitted unevenly across networks. However, these are not necessarily failings of the network metaphor but, rather, of its employment to date within economic geography. Where most economic geographers have come to see the network metaphor as a way of representing connections between the nodes that they study (frequently cities or firms), transport geographers have long taken the network itself as the principal object of study. In the research of many transport geographers, networks appear as powerful agents shaping the places they connect. Incorporation of lessons drawn from transport geography into the burgeoning literature on networks in economic geography can overcome some of the growing criticism of network methodologies. The author uses an analysis of container flows to the West Coast of the United States to demonstrate the advantages of a network methodology based on transport networks.

[1]  D. Hodge,et al.  MY FAIR SHARE: EQUITY ISSUES IN URBAN TRANSPORTATION. , 1995 .

[2]  J. Beaverstock,et al.  Attending to the world: Competition, cooperation and connectivity in the world city network , 2002 .

[3]  David A. Smith,et al.  World City Networks and Hierarchies, 1977-1997 , 2001 .

[4]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[5]  Neil Reid,et al.  Technological Change and the Concentration of the U.S. General Cargo Port System: 1970–88 , 1992 .

[6]  G. Gereffi.  Shifting Governance Structures in Global Commodity Chains, With Special Reference to the Internet , 2001 .

[7]  Brian Slack,et al.  The evolution of a regional container port system: the Pearl River Delta , 2000 .

[8]  P. Hall,et al.  MUTUAL SPECIALISATION, SEAPORTS AND THE GEOGRAPHY OF AUTOMOBILE IMPORTS , 2004 .

[9]  Douglas K. Fleming,et al.  ON THE BEATEN TRACK : A VIEW OF US WEST-COAST CONTAINER PORT COMPETITION , 1989 .

[10]  B. Derudder,et al.  Hierarchical Tendencies and Regional Patterns in the World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis of 234 Cities , 2003 .

[11]  Susan Hanson,et al.  OFF THE ROAD?: REFLECTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION GEOGRAPHY IN THE INFORMATION AGE , 1998 .

[12]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Challenging the Derived Transport-Demand Thesis: Geographical Issues in Freight Distribution , 2006 .

[13]  Benjamin H. Stevens,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON SHIFT‐SHARE AS A FORECASTING TECHNIQUE* , 1980 .

[14]  K. Olds,et al.  Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy , 2001 .

[15]  Richard G. Smith.  World city actor-networks , 2003 .

[16]  Yehuda Hayuth,et al.  RATIONALIZATION AND DECONCENTRATION OF THE U.S. CONTAINER PORT SYSTEM , 1988 .

[17]  Henry Wai-chung Yeung,et al.  Organising regional production networks in Southeast Asia: implications for production fragmentation, trade, and rules of origin , 2001 .

[18]  Gordon L. Clark,et al.  London in the European financial services industry: locational advantage and product complementarities , 2002 .

[19]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  CONCENTRATION AND LOAD CENTRE DEVELOPMENT IN THE EUROPEAN CONTAINER PORT SYSTEM , 1997 .

[20]  Peter J. Taylor,et al.  Exploratory Analysis of the World City Network , 2002 .

[21]  W. Larner,et al.  The Spaces and Subjects of a Globalising Economy: A Situated Exploration of Method , 2002 .

[22]  B. Slack,et al.  Rethinking the Port , 2006 .

[23]  J. Friedmann.  The World City Hypothesis , 1986 .

[24]  A. Baird,et al.  SOME REFLECTIONS ON PORT COMPETITION IN THE UNITED STATES AND WESTERN EUROPE. COMMENT , 1999 .

[25]  Robert J. McCalla,et al.  GLOBAL CHANGE, LOCAL PAIN: INTERMODAL SEAPORT TERMINALS AND THEIR SERVICE AREAS , 1999 .

[26]  Trevor D. Heaver,et al.  The Evolving Roles of Shipping Lines in International Logistics , 2002 .

[27]  G. Schwarz.  Enabling Global Trade above the Clouds: Restructuring Processes and Information Technology in the Transatlantic Air-Cargo Industry , 2006 .

[28]  A. Alderson,et al.  Power and Position in the World City System1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  H. Meersman,et al.  Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports , 2001 .

[30]  D. Rigby,et al.  Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities , 2002 .

[31]  Yehuda Hayuth,et al.  CONCEPTS OF STRATEGIC COMMERCIAL LOCATION: THE CASE OF CONTAINER PORTS. , 1994 .

[32]  S. Hanson.  GETTING THERE: URBAN TRANSPORTATION IN CONTEXT. , 1995 .

[33]  C. Airriess.  Global Economy and Port Morphology in Belawan, Indonesia , 1991 .

[34]  P. Taylor,et al.  Measurement of the World City Network , 2002 .

[35]  C. Airriess.  The spatial spread of container transport in a developing regional economy: North Sumatra, Indonesia , 1989 .

[36]  Eric Sheppard,et al.  The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality* , 2002 .

[37]  Jonathan V. Beaverstock,et al.  World-City Network: A New Metageography? , 2000, The Urban Geography Reader.

[38]  E. Ullman.  Human Geography and area Research , 1953 .

[39]  Stephen Graham.  Communication grids: Cities and infrastructure , 2002 .

[40]  John Law,et al.  Traduction / Trahison: Notes on ANT , 2006 .

[41]  Susan Hanson,et al.  Transportation: Hooked on Speed, Eyeing Sustainability , 2008 .

[42]  Brian Slack,et al.  Pawns in the Game: Ports in a Global Transportation System , 1993 .

[43]  M. Danson.  Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies , 2007 .

[44]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 2000 .

[45]  H. Yeung.  Practicing New Economic Geographies: A Methodological Examination , 2003 .

[46]  N. Thrift.  Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 1995 .

[47]  Jamie Peck.  Economic Sociologies in Space , 2005 .

[48]  Brian Slack,et al.  The challenge of peripheral ports: an Asian perspective , 2002 .

[49]  Emmanuel Guy,et al.  Shipping line networks and the integration of South America trades , 2003 .

[50]  Stig Tenold.  A most convenient flag--the basis for the expansion of the Singapore fleet, 1969-82 , 2003 .

[51]  Trevor D. Heaver,et al.  The implications of increased competition among ports for port policy and management , 1995 .

[52]  G. Sheath,et al.  Global supply chains and networking: A critical perspective on learning challenges in the New Zealand dairy and sheepmeat commodity chains , 2001 .

[53]  R. Barff,et al.  Dynamic Shift‐Share Analysis , 1988 .

[54]  Alfred J. Baird,et al.  Comment Some reflections on port competition in the United States and western Europe , 1999 .

[55]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  EMBEDDING ECONOMIES OF SCALE CONCEPTS FOR HUB NETWORK DESIGN. , 2001 .

[56]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN LARGE CONTAINERSHIPS: OPTIMAL SIZE AND GEOGRAPHICAL IMPLICATIONS. , 2000 .

[57]  Torsten Hägerstraand.  WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[58]  Daniel Olivier,et al.  Port–FEZ Bundles as Spaces of Global Articulation: The Case of Tianjin, China , 2006 .

[59]  B. Slack,et al.  Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective , 2002 .

[60]  Wendell Bell,et al.  Location and Space-Economy. , 1957 .