Monitoring of Intracranial Compliance: Correction for a Change in Body Position

Summary The objectives of our study were 1. to investigate whether the intracranial compliance changes with body position; 2. to test if the pressure-volume index (PVI) calculation is affected by different body positions; 3. to define the optimal parameter to correct PVI for changes in body position and 4. to investigate the physiological meaning of the constant term (P0) in the model of the intracranial volume-pressure relationship. Thirteen patients were included in this study. All patients were subjected to 2 to 3 different body positions. In each position, either classic bolus injection was performed for measurement of intracranial compliance and calculation of PVI or the new Spiegelberg compliance monitor was used to calculate PVI continuously. Four different models were used for calculating the constant pressure term P0 and the P0 corrected PVI values. Pressure volume index not corrected for the constant term P0 significantly decreased with elevating the patients head (r=0.70, p<0.0001). In contrast, volume-pressure response and ICP pulse amplitude did not change with position. Using the constant term P0 to correct the PVI we found no changes between the different body positions. Our results suggest that during the variation in body position there is no change in intracranial compliance but a change in hydrostatic offset pressure which causes a shifting of the volume-pressure curve along the pressure axis without its shape being affected. PVI measurements should either be performed only with the patient in the 0° recumbent position or that the PVI calculation should be corrected for the hydrostatic difference between the level of the ICP transducer and the hydrostatic indifference point of the craniospinal system close to the third thoracic vertebra.

[1]  A. Marmarou,et al.  Pressure-volume index in head injury. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  J. Miller,et al.  CSF pressure-volume dynamics in neurosurgical patients: a preliminary evaluation in six patients. , 1978, Surgical neurology.

[3]  E. Ott,et al.  Redistribution of regional cerebral blood flow after glycerol infusion in acute cerebral infarction , 1974, Neurology.

[4]  A. Marmarou,et al.  Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system. , 1975, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  B Magnaes,et al.  Body position and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Part 2: clinical studies on orthostatic pressure and the hydrostatic indifferent point. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  B. Magnaes,et al.  Body position and cerebrospinal fluid pressure , 1976 .

[7]  J. Löfgren,et al.  THE PRESSURE‐VOLUME CURVE OF THE CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SPACE IN DOGS , 1973, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[8]  J. Löfgren,et al.  INFLUENCE OF A SUPRATENTORIAL EXPANDING MASS ON INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE‐VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS , 1973, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[9]  J. Miller,et al.  Intracranial volume–pressure relationships during experimental brain compression in primates , 1974, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  J. H. M. van Eijndhoven,et al.  A New Method of Monitoring Intracranial Volume/Pressure Relationship , 1976 .

[11]  J D Pickard,et al.  Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: a guide to interpretation based on an observational study. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  J. Tans,et al.  Intracranial volume-pressure relationship in man. Part 2: Clinical significance of the pressure-volume index. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  A. Marmarou,et al.  Clinical applications of the pressure-volume index in treatment of pediatric head injuries. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  J. Pickard,et al.  Intracranial volume pressure studies in patients with head injury. , 1974, Injury.

[15]  J D Pickard,et al.  Induced changes of cerebrospinal fluid volume. Effects during continuous monitoring of ventricular fluid pressure. , 1973, Archives of neurology.

[16]  I. Piper,et al.  Automated time-averaged analysis of craniospinal compliance (short pulse response). , 1990, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[17]  Reliability of intraventricular pressure measurement with fiberoptic or solid-state transducers: avoidance of a methodological error. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[18]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  Posttraumatic ventriculomegaly: hydrocephalus or atrophy? A new approach for diagnosis using CSF dynamics. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.