Contrails, Cirrus Trends, and Climate

Rising global air traffic and its associated contrails have the potential for affecting climate via radiative forcing. Current estimates of contrail climate effects are based on coverage by linear contrails that do not account for spreading and, therefore, represent the minimum impact. The maximum radiative impact is estimated by assuming that long-term trends in cirrus coverage are due entirely to air traffic in areas where humidity is relatively constant. Surface observations from 1971 to 1995 show that cirrus increased significantly over the northern oceans and the United States while decreasing over other land areas except over western Europe where cirrus coverage was relatively constant. The surface observations are consistent with satellite-derived trends over most areas. Land cirrus trends are positively correlated with upper-tropospheric (300 hPa) humidity (UTH), derived from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) analyses, except over the United States and western Europe where air traffic is heaviest. Over oceans, the cirrus trends are negatively correlated with the NCEP relative humidity suggesting some large uncertainties in the maritime UTH. The NCEP UTH decreased dramatically over Europe while remaining relatively steady over the United States, thereby permitting an assessment of the cirrus‐contrail relationship over the United States. Seasonal cirrus changes over the United States are generally consistent with the annual cycle of contrail coverage and frequency lending additional evidence to the role of contrails in the observed trend. It is concluded that the U.S. cirrus trends are most likely due to air traffic. The cirrus increase is a factor of 1.8 greater than that expected from current estimates of linear contrail coverage suggesting that a spreading factor of the same magnitude can be used to estimate the maximum effect of the contrails. From the U.S. results and using mean contrail optical depths of 0.15 and 0.25, the maximum contrail‐cirrus global radiative forcing is estimated to be 0.006‐0.025 W m22 depending on the radiative forcing model. Using results from a general circulation model simulation of contrails, the cirrus trends over the United States are estimated to cause a tropospheric warming of 0.28‐0.38C decade21, a range that includes the observed tropospheric temperature trend of 0.278C decade21 between 1975 and 1994. The magnitude of the estimated surface temperature change and the seasonal variations of the estimated temperature trends are also in good agreement with the corresponding observations.

[1]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Spreading of isolated contrails during the 2001 air traffic shutdown , 2002 .

[2]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[3]  W. Collins,et al.  The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation , 2001 .

[4]  S. Vay,et al.  Prevalence of ice‐supersaturated regions in the upper troposphere: Implications for optically thin ice cloud formation , 2001 .

[5]  D. F. Young,et al.  Transformation of contrails into cirrus during SUCCESS , 1998 .

[6]  H. Hansson,et al.  Cirrus cloud occurrence as function of ambient relative humidity: A comparison of observations from the Southern and Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes obtained during the INCA experiment , 2003 .

[7]  Towards a reliable GCM estimation of contrail radiative forcing , 2002 .

[8]  R. Chervin,et al.  Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over the ocean , 1988 .

[9]  U. Schumann,et al.  Radiative forcing by contrails , 1999 .

[10]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Global distribution of contrail radiative forcing , 1999 .

[11]  J. Knaff,et al.  Erratum: ``1973-1996 trends in depth-averaged tropospheric temperature'' , 1998 .

[12]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[13]  Robert E. Eskridge,et al.  A comprehensive aerological reference data set (CARDS): Rough and systematic errors , 1995 .

[14]  Ulrich Schumann,et al.  Regional radiative forcing by line-shaped contrails derived from satellite data , 2002 .

[15]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Global indirect aerosol effects: a review , 2004 .

[16]  P. Minnis,et al.  A Case Study of the Development of Contrail Clusters over the Great Lakes , 2004 .

[17]  Robert Sausen,et al.  A Diagnostic Study of the Global Distribution of Contrails Part I: Present Day Climateast; , 1998 .

[18]  W. Elliott,et al.  On the Utility of Radiosonde Humidity Archives for climate studies , 1991 .

[19]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  A USA Commercial Flight Track Database for Upper Tropospheric Aircraft Emission Studies , 2003 .

[20]  O. Boucher Air traffic may increase cirrus cloudiness , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Klaus Gierens,et al.  A Diagnostic Study of the Present and Future Coverage by Contrails , 1998 .

[22]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Contrail climatology over the USA from MODIS and AVHRR data , 2002 .

[23]  Petra M. Udelhofen,et al.  Cloud cover variations over the United States: An influence of cosmic rays or solar variability? , 2001 .

[24]  W. Elliott,et al.  Recent Changes in NWS Upper-Air Observations with Emphasis on Changes from VIZ to Vaisala Radiosondes , 2002 .

[25]  Modeled impact of cirrus cloud increases along aircraft flight paths , 2000 .

[26]  J. Penner,et al.  Aviation and the Global Atmosphere , 1999 .

[27]  P. Minnis,et al.  Estimates of cloud radiative forcing in contrail clusters using GOES imagery , 2001 .

[28]  C. J. Hahn,et al.  Extended Edited Synoptic Cloud Reports from Ships and Land Stations Over the Globe, 1952-1996 , 1999 .

[29]  O. Toon,et al.  Ice nucleation in the upper troposphere: Sensitivity to aerosol number density, temperature, and cooling rate , 1994 .

[30]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Contrail Frequency over the United States from Surface Observations , 2003 .

[31]  J. Angell Variation with Height and Latitude of Radiosonde Temperature Trends in North America, 1975–94 , 1999 .

[32]  The influence of increased jet airline traffic on the amountof high level cloudiness in Alaska , 2001 .

[33]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Contrail-Cirrus and Their Potential for Regional Climate Change , 1997 .

[34]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Haze Particle Nucleation Simulations in Cirrus Clouds, and Applications for Numerical and Lidar Studies , 1989 .

[35]  Darren L. Jackson,et al.  Trends in upper‐tropospheric humidity , 2001 .

[36]  L. Jenne,et al.  Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over land , 1986 .

[37]  Klaus Gierens,et al.  A distribution law for relative humidity in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere derived from three years of MOZAIC measurements , 1999 .

[38]  Stanley A. Changnon Midwestern Cloud, Sunshine and Temperature Trends since 1901: Possible Evidence of Jet Contrail Effects , 1981 .

[39]  Holger Vömel,et al.  Characterization and correction of relative humidity measurements from Vaisala RS80-A radiosondes at cold temperatures , 2001 .

[40]  John R. Lanzante,et al.  An Assessment of Satellite and Radiosonde Climatologies of Upper-Tropospheric Water Vapor. , 1996 .

[41]  Andrew M. Carleton,et al.  Climatology: Contrails reduce daily temperature range , 2002, Nature.

[42]  R. Sausen,et al.  Contrails in a comprehensive global climate model: Parameterization and radiative forcing results , 2002 .

[43]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Effects on Climate Records of Changes in National Weather Service Humidity Processing Procedures , 1998 .