Using the Efficient Global Optimization Algorithm to Assist Nuclear Criticality Safety Assessment

Abstract Nuclear criticality safety assessment often requires groupwise Monte Carlo simulations of k-effective in order to check subcriticality of the system of interest. A typical task to be performed by safety assessors is hence to find the worst combination of input parameters of the criticality Monte Carlo code (i.e., leading to maximum reactivity) over the whole operating range. Then, checking subcriticality can be done by solving a maximization problem where the input-output map defined by the Monte Carlo code expectation (or an upper quantile) stands for the objective function or “parametric” model. This straightforward view of criticality parametric calculations complies with recent works in Design of Computer Experiments, an active research field in applied statistics. This framework provides a robust support to enhance and consolidate good practices in criticality safety assessment. Indeed, supplementing the standard “expert-driven” assessment by a suitable optimization algorithm may be helpful to increase the reliability of the whole process and the robustness of its conclusions. Such a new safety practice is intended to rely on both well-suited mathematical tools (compliant optimization algorithms) and computing infrastructure (a flexible grid-computing environment).

[1]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[2]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[3]  Chi-Keong Goh,et al.  Computational Intelligence in Expensive Optimization Problems , 2010 .

[4]  Yves Deville,et al.  DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based Metamodeling and Optimization , 2012 .

[5]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[6]  David Ginsbourger,et al.  A Multi-points Criterion for Deterministic Parallel Global Optimization based on Kriging , 2007 .

[7]  Victor Picheny,et al.  Noisy kriging-based optimization methods: A unified implementation within the DiceOptim package , 2014, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[8]  Julien Bect,et al.  Robust Gaussian Process-Based Global Optimization Using a Fully Bayesian Expected Improvement Criterion , 2011, LION.

[9]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Convergence properties of the expected improvement algorithm with fixed mean and covariance functions , 2007, 0712.3744.

[10]  David Ginsbourger,et al.  Multiples métamodèles pour l'approximation et l'optimisation de fonctions numériques multivariables , 2009 .

[11]  D. Krige A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, by D.G. Krige, published in the Journal, December 1951 : introduction by the author , 1951 .

[12]  Dmitry Yarotsky,et al.  Examples of inconsistency in optimization by expected improvement , 2011, J. Glob. Optim..

[13]  B. Minasny,et al.  The Matérn function as a general model for soil variograms , 2005 .

[14]  Magnus Arnér,et al.  Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2014 .