Registration of ‘CP 04‐1935’ Sugarcane

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or trans mitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. ABSTRACT ‘CP 04-1935’ (Reg. No. CV-154, PI 667660) sugarcane (a complex hybrid of Saccharum spp.) was developed through cooperative research conducted by the USDA-ARS, the University of Florida, and the Florida Sugar Cane League and was released to growers in Florida on 20 Sept. 2011. CP 04-1935 was selected from the cross CP 94-2059/CP 84-1322 made at Canal Point, FL on 8 Dec. 1998. In the final stage of selection, CP 04-1935 was tested for yield performance at two sand-soil locations along with 15 other genotypes across three crop years and for freeze tolerance in northern Florida for two crop years. CP 04-1935 produced an 11% higher cane yield, a 3.5% higher sucrose content, and a 14.5% higher sucrose yield than the reference sand cultivar CP 78-1628. CP 04-1935 is resistant to brown rust (caused by Puccinia melanocephala H. & P. Sydow), orange rust (caused by Puccinia kuehnii E.J. Butler), mosaic (caused by Sugarcane mosaic virus strain E), to smut (caused by Ustilago scitaminea H. & P. Sydow), and to eyespot [caused by the Bipolaris sacchari (E.J. Butler) Shoemaker]; it is moderately resistant to leaf scald (caused by Xanthomonas albilineans Ashby, Dowson), and to ratoon stunt (caused by Leifsonia xyli subsp. xyli Evtushenko et al.), but it is susceptible to Sugarcane yellow leaf virus. CP 04-1935 performed significantly worse under freeze conditions than CP 89-2143, the Florida industry standard for acceptable freeze tolerance. With its profitability predicted to be 19% higher than that of CP 78-1628, combined with a good disease profile, CP 04-1935 was recommended for planting on sand soils in Florida.

[1]  S. Edmé,et al.  Field Response of Sugarcane Genotypes to Freeze Stress with Genotype x Environment Effects on Quality Traits , 2013 .

[2]  T. E. Reagan,et al.  Registration of ‘L 01–283’ Sugarcane , 2010 .

[3]  S. Edmé,et al.  Improving Efficiency of Sugarcane Genotype Selection in Florida , 2010 .

[4]  C. A. Kimbeng,et al.  Registration of ‘L 99‐226’ Sugarcane , 2009 .

[5]  S. Edmé,et al.  Registration of 'CP 00-2180' Sugarcane , 2009 .

[6]  J. Comstock,et al.  DIVERSITY AMONG MAINLAND USA SUGARCANE CULTIVARS EXAMINED BY , 2009 .

[7]  T. E. Reagan,et al.  Registration of 'L 79-1002' sugarcane. , 2008 .

[8]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  Location Contributions Determined via GGE Biplot Analysis of Multienvironment Sugarcane Genotype‐Performance Trials , 2008 .

[9]  J. Comstock.  SUGARCANE YIELD LOSS DUE TO RATOON STUNT , 2008 .

[10]  B. Glaz,et al.  Sugarcane Variety Census: Florida 2002 , 2007, EDIS.

[11]  J. Comstock,et al.  COMPARISON OF SUGARCANE DISEASE INCIDENCE AND YIELD OF FIELD-RUN , HEAT-TREATED , AND TISSUE-CULTURE BASED SEEDCANE , 2005 .

[12]  Barry Glaz,et al.  Genetic contribution to yield gains in the Florida sugarcane industry across 33 years , 2005 .

[13]  A. Risterucci,et al.  Targeted mapping of a sugarcane rust resistance gene (Bru1) using bulked segregant analysis and AFLP markers , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[14]  R. Henry,et al.  Sugarcane microsatellites for the assessment of genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm , 2003 .

[15]  J. Comstock,et al.  Registration of ‘CP 89-2377’ Sugarcane , 2000 .

[16]  J. Comstock,et al.  Registration of ‘CP 89-2143’ Sugarcane , 2000 .

[17]  J. Comstock,et al.  Registration of ‘CP 88-1762’ Sugarcane , 1997 .

[18]  C. Deren.  Genetic base of U.S. Mainland sugarcane , 1995 .

[19]  J. Comstock,et al.  Registration of 'CP 85-1308' sugarcane , 1995 .

[20]  B. Glaz,et al.  Use of economic criteria-for selection clones in a sugarcane breeding program , 1995 .

[21]  J. Comstock,et al.  Registration of ‘CP 84-1198’ Sugarcane , 1994 .

[22]  J. Miller,et al.  Use of Plant Introductions in Sugarcane Cultivar Development , 1992 .

[23]  B. Glaz,et al.  Registration of ‘CP 80-1743’ Sugarcane , 1991 .

[24]  B. Glaz,et al.  Registration of 'CP 81-1302' sugarcane , 1991 .

[25]  B. Glaz,et al.  Registration of ‘CP 78-1628’ Sugarcane , 1991 .

[26]  B. Glaz,et al.  Registration of 'CP 80-1827' sugarcane. , 1990 .

[27]  D. J. Heinz,et al.  Chapter 5 – Cytogenetics , 1987 .

[28]  J. L. Dean,et al.  Registration of CP 72-2086 Sugarcane , 1984 .

[29]  J. L. Dean,et al.  Registration of CP 73-1547 Sugarcane1(Reg. No. 59) , 1982 .

[30]  J. L. Dean,et al.  Registration of CP 72‐1210 Sugarcane1 (Reg. No. 55) , 1981 .

[31]  J. Miller,et al.  The pedigree of selected Canal Point (CP) varieties of sugarcane , 1981 .

[32]  J. L. Dean,et al.  Registration of CP 70‐1133 Sugarcane1 (Reg. No. 45) , 1978 .

[33]  H. P. Fanguy,et al.  Registration of CP 65‐357 Sugarcane1 (Reg. No. 35) , 1974 .

[34]  E. R. Rice,et al.  Registration OF.C.P. 62-374 Sugarcane1 (Reg. No. 12) , 1969 .

[35]  E. R. Rice,et al.  Registration of C.P. 57‐614 Sugarcane1 (Reg. No. 10) , 1969 .

[36]  J. Loutit.  Cytogenetics , 1976 .

[37]  E. Artschwager,et al.  Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). , 1958 .