Modelling of solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration

Abstract This work presents a new approach for modelling of transport of small organic components in nanofiltration of organic solvents. The solute rejection in non-aqueous nanofiltration is affected by a number of membrane–solvent–component interactions, which must be incorporated in a generalised transport model. Since measuring or calculating membrane–solvent–component interactions is difficult, a simple empirical approach is adopted to model the data based on a pore-flow formalism. Previous work showed that solute transport in non-aqueous NF is mainly dominated by convection, but transport models for pore flow, available in the literature, only consider aqueous feed streams. In this article, solvent dependency was implemented in these models in terms of effective pore and solute diameters. This approach was applied on four literature models (the SHP-model, the Ferry model, the Verniory model and the lognormal model). Descriptive modelling of the experimental rejection data of different reference components in methanol, ethanol, acetone and ethyl acetate resulted in the identification of unknown membrane characteristics (pore size or pore size distribution), clearly confirming the solvent dependence of these parameters. This effect was observed for both polymeric and ceramic NF-membranes. The membrane parameters identified from the data fitting were used for predictive modelling of the rejection of raffinose in methanol and ethanol, with a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic NF membrane. A high correlation between predicted values and experimental data was found.

[1]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Homogeneous phase transfer catalyst recovery and re-use using solvent resistant membranes , 2002 .

[2]  Dibakar Bhattacharyya,et al.  Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute–solvent coupling , 2002 .

[3]  J. Ferry,et al.  Ultrafilter Membranes and Ultrafiltration. , 1936 .

[4]  C Vandecasteele,et al.  Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. , 2002, Water research.

[5]  Carlo Vandecasteele,et al.  Influence of organic solvents on the performance of polymeric nanofiltration membranes , 2002 .

[6]  Shoji Kimura,et al.  MODELS OF MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PHENOMENA AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR ULTRAFILTRATION DATA , 1982 .

[7]  Daniel Lemordant,et al.  Membrane characterization using microscopic image analysis , 2001 .

[8]  F. P. Cuperus,et al.  Acetone-stable nanofiltration membranes in deacidifying vegetable oil , 1999 .

[9]  Xiaojing Yang,et al.  Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents , 2001 .

[10]  Bart Van der Bruggen,et al.  Solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration: effect of membrane material , 2005 .

[11]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Observations on solvent flux and solute rejection across solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes , 2002 .

[12]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Describe the Maximal Retention of Organic Molecules in Nanofiltration , 2000 .

[13]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures : Influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection , 2005 .

[14]  N. A. Bhore,et al.  NEW MEMBRANE PROCESS DEBOTTLENECKS SOLVENT DEWAXING UNIT , 1999 .

[15]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes , 2005 .

[16]  A. Verniory,et al.  Measurement of the Permeability of Biological Membranes Application to the glomerular wall , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[17]  A. Buekenhoudt,et al.  Recycling of the homogeneous Co-Jacobsen catalyst through solvent-resistant nanofiltration (SRNF). , 2004, Chemical communications.

[18]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[19]  R. Schnabel,et al.  Separation of protein mixtures by BIORAN® porous glass membranes , 1988 .

[20]  L. Zeman,et al.  Steric Rejection of Polymeric Solutes by Membranes with Uniform Pore Size Distribution , 1981 .

[21]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane , 2002 .

[22]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Solvent recovery and partial deacidification of vegetable oils by membrane technology , 1996 .

[23]  Donald R Paul,et al.  Reformulation of the solution-diffusion theory of reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[24]  Kamalesh K. Sirkar,et al.  Nanofiltration studies of larger organic microsolutes in methanol solutions , 2000 .

[25]  Lloyd S. White,et al.  Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane , 2002 .

[26]  W. Gill,et al.  REVIEW OF REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES AND TRANSPORT MODELS , 1981 .

[27]  C. Geankoplis Transport processes and unit operations , 1978 .

[28]  H. K. Lonsdale,et al.  Statistical-mechanical theory of membrane transport , 1990 .

[29]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .