Analysis of Flow Dynamics and Outcomes of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Intrasaccular Flow-Diverting Devices

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intrasaccular flow diversion offers a promising treatment option for complex bifurcation aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to compare the flow conditions between successfully occluded and incompletely occluded aneurysms treated with intrasaccular devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hemodynamics in 18 completely occluded aneurysms after treatment with intrasaccular devices was compared against 18 that were incompletely occluded at follow-up. Hemodynamic and geometric parameters were obtained from computational fluid dynamics models constructed from 3D angiographies. Models of the intrasaccular devices were created and interactively deployed within the vascular models using posttreatment angiography images for guidance. Hemodynamic and geometric variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney test and univariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Incomplete occlusion was associated with large posttreatment mean aneurysm inflows (P = .02) and small reductions in the mean inflow rate (P = .01) and inflow concentration index (P = .03). Incompletely occluded aneurysms were larger (P = .002) and had wider necks (P = .004) than completely occluded aneurysms and tended to have more complex flow patterns, though this trend was not significant after adjusting for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of cerebral aneurysm treatment with intrasaccular flow diverters is associated with flow conditions created immediately after device implantation. Flow conditions unfavorable for immediate and complete occlusion seem to be created by improper positioning or orientation of the device. Complete occlusion is more difficult to achieve in larger aneurysms, aneurysms with wider necks, and aneurysms with stronger and more complex flows.

[1]  V. Pereira,et al.  Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis , 2012, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[2]  Fernando Mut,et al.  Image‐based modeling of blood flow in cerebral aneurysms treated with intrasaccular flow diverting devices , 2019, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[3]  I. Saatci,et al.  A Novel “Y” Stent Flow Diversion Technique for the Endovascular Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms without Endosaccular Coiling , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  L. Pierot,et al.  Endovascular techniques for the management of wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: A critical review of the literature. , 2016, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[5]  Jason M. Davies,et al.  Association between hemodynamic modifications and clinical outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverters , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics of stented intracranial aneurysms using adaptive embedded unstructured grids , 2008 .

[7]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  D. Ruijters,et al.  Understanding Angiography-Based Aneurysm Flow Fields through Comparison with Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  A. Narata,et al.  Are Anatomic Results Influenced by WEB Shape Modification? Analysis in a Prospective, Single-Center Series of 39 Patients with Aneurysms Treated with the WEB , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[10]  R. Löhner,et al.  Fast numerical solutions of patient‐specific blood flows in 3D arterial systems , 2010, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[11]  Aichi Chien,et al.  Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms , 2011, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[12]  L. Pierot,et al.  Endovascular WEB flow disruption in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: preliminary feasibility, clinical, and anatomical results in a multicenter study. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[13]  C. Putman,et al.  Flow–area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[14]  K. Lovblad,et al.  A DSA-Based Method Using Contrast-Motion Estimation for the Assessment of the Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Changes Induced by Flow-Diverter Stents , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  W. Reith,et al.  Evaluation of occurring complications after flow diverter treatment of elastase-induced aneurysm in rabbits using micro-CT and MRI at 9.4 T , 2016, Neuroradiology.

[17]  Geng Zhou,et al.  Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[18]  L. Pierot,et al.  Intrasaccular Flow-Disruption Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Study , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  G. Duckwiler,et al.  WEB Device for Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[20]  D F Kallmes,et al.  The Woven EndoBridge: A New Aneurysm Occlusion Device , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  I. Saatci,et al.  Double Stent–Assisted Coil Embolization Treatment for Bifurcation Aneurysms: Immediate Treatment Results and Long-Term Angiographic Outcome , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.