Improving the Quality of Magnetic Signature Reproduction by Increasing Flexibility of Multi-Dipole Model Structure and Enriching Measurement Information

The paper presents the construction of a multi-dipole model that allows reproducing magnetic signatures of ferromagnetic objects. The virtual object used in the paper is an ellipsoid, which is the source of synthetic data. To make the situation more realistic, noise is added to the synthetic data. Two significant improvements compared to previous work are presented. Three-axial magnetometers are introduced instead of uniaxial magnetometers. However, a more important change is the modification of the model structure that allows placing dipoles on the entire plane, e.g. object’s deck. The multi-dipole model consists of an a priori assumed number of permanent and induced single-dipole models. Each single dipole is described by three magnetic moments and, depending on the applied approach, one or two dipole position parameters. The non-linear least-squares optimization method is used to determine model parameters. To assess the quality of magnetic signature reproduction, qualitative and quantitative forms are used. The final quality assessment is based on differences between the reference fields and the fields determined from the multi-dipole model. The applied modifications bring significant improvement, however, only their combined application allows to restore magnetic signatures with good quality for directions other than for which the data were available.

[1]  P. Jankowski,et al.  Applying of thin plate boundary condition in analysis of ship’s magnetic field , 2018, COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering.

[2]  Junqi Gao,et al.  Estimation of dipole magnetic moment orientation based on magnetic signature waveform analysis by a magnetic sensor , 2020 .

[4]  Gilles Cauffet,et al.  Modeling of static magnetic anomaly created by iron plates , 2000 .

[5]  Decomposition of Ferromagnetic Signature Into Induced and Permanent Components , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  Yogadhish Das,et al.  Fast Nonrecursive Method for Estimating Location and Dipole Moment Components of a Static Magnetic Dipole , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Jesse Pentzer,et al.  Field measurement of surface ship magnetic signature using multiple AUVs , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[8]  I. Gloza,et al.  Ranges and equipment for the measurement of the ship's underwater signatures , 2012 .

[9]  John J. Holmes,et al.  Modeling a Ship's Ferromagnetic Signatures , 2007, Modeling a Ship's Ferromagnetic Signatures.

[10]  Alexander A. Kaufman,et al.  Principles of Electromagnetic Methods in Surface Geophysics , 2014 .

[11]  John J. Holmes,et al.  Reduction of a Ship's Magnetic Field Signatures , 2008, Reduction of a Ship's Magnetic Field Signatures.

[12]  K. Jakubiuk,et al.  Multidipoles model of ship's magnetic field , 2012 .

[13]  Gérard Meunier,et al.  Ship magnetizations modelling by the finite element method , 1992 .

[14]  Ships Magnetic Anomaly Computation With Integral Equation and Fast Multipole Method , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[15]  Gilles Cauffet,et al.  Recent improvements for solving inverse magnetostatic problem applied to thin shells , 2002 .

[16]  Chang-Seob Yang,et al.  Magnetic Dipole Modeling Combined With Material Sensitivity Analysis for Solving an Inverse Problem of Thin Ferromagnetic Sheet , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.