Historical and epistemological trends in public administration

Begins with a brief overview of how public administration emerged as the positivist theory and technocratic practice of the modern administrative state. The question then becomes: To what extent has public administration been affected by the societal shift toward postmodernism? The author argues that public administration has moved some distance away from its positivist origins; however, the transformation of public administration is still incomplete. The author concludes that public administration should pay more attention to the recent developments of post‐positivist methods of analysis rather than attempting to adopt all the tenets of postmodernism. Large bureaucratic organizations remain typically modern, but they should not be either conceptualized or managed as small machines.

[1]  D. Reid,et al.  Fayol: from experience to theory , 1995 .

[2]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Policy Paradox and Political Reason , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[3]  G. Caiden.  The dynamics of public administration: Guidelines to current transformations in theory and practice , 1971 .

[4]  J. Harris.  Introductory Public Administration Textbooks , 1994 .

[5]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  Breaking Through Bureaucracy , 1992 .

[6]  G. Dizerega.  Democracy as a spontaneous order , 1989 .

[7]  Douglas Torgerson.  Book review essay: Reuniting theory and practice , 1992 .

[8]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[9]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos , 1992 .

[10]  Elgin Williams,et al.  The Function of the Executive , 1947 .

[11]  Steven Cohen,et al.  Total quality management in government , 1993 .

[12]  Mary Parker Follett.  The new state , 1918 .

[13]  R. Lewin,et al.  Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos , 1992 .

[14]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[15]  K. Kernaghan.  Empowerment and public administration: revolutionary advance or passing fancy? , 1992 .

[16]  Martin Hollis,et al.  The philosophy of social science : an introduction , 1994 .

[17]  David Arellano Gault,et al.  L. Douglas Kiel,managing chaos and complexity in government .A new paradigm for managing change, innovation and organizational renewal , San Francisco, Jossey -Bass,1994 , 1995 .

[18]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[19]  J. Hughes,et al.  The philosophy of social research , 1981 .

[20]  Guy B. Adams.  Enthralled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration. , 1992 .

[21]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .

[22]  D. Waldo.  The Study Of Public Administration , 1955 .

[23]  D. Osborne,et al.  Reinventing Government: How the En-trepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , 1992 .

[24]  H. Lasswell.  A pre-view of policy sciences , 1971 .

[25]  Douglas Torgerson.  Priest and jester in the policy sciences: Developing the focus of inquiry , 1992 .

[26]  H. G. Frederickson.  New Public Administration , 1980 .

[27]  Elspeth Graham,et al.  Postmodernism and the Social Sciences , 1992 .

[28]  B. Watson,et al.  Managing in Turbulent Times. By Peter F. Drucker. New York: Harper & Rowe, 1980 , 1980 .

[29]  P. Drucker,et al.  管理的实践=The practice of management , 1954 .

[30]  D. Mcgregor.  The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .

[31]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[32]  N. Carter.  General and Industrial Management , 1986 .

[33]  R. Ruthen.  Adapting to Complexity , 1993 .

[34]  William A. Treadwell.  Fuzzy Set Theory Movement in the Social Sciences , 1995 .

[35]  Alasdair S. Roberts.  'Civic Discovery' as a Rhetorical Strategy , 1995 .

[36]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Managing in Turbulent Times , 1980 .

[37]  J. D. White.  On the Growth of Knowledge in Public Administration. , 1986 .

[38]  Douglas Torgerson.  Theoretical issues in policy analysis , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[39]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[40]  G. J. Miller,et al.  Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. , 1992 .

[41]  Henry Mintzberg.  The rise and fall of strategic planning , 1993 .

[42]  Laurent Dobuzinskis.  Modernist and postmodernist metaphors of the policy process: Control and stability vs. chaos and reflexive understanding , 1992 .

[43]  D. Savoie.  What is Wrong with the New Public Management , 1995 .

[44]  D. Waldo,et al.  The Administrative State , 1948 .

[45]  Nicholas Henry,et al.  Public Administration and Public Affairs , 1980 .

[46]  E. László.  The age of bifurcation : understanding the changing world , 1991 .

[47]  G. Daneke.  A Science of Public Administration , 1990 .

[48]  H. Simon,et al.  The behavioral approach: With emphasis on economics , 1983 .

[49]  Nelson R. Kellogg,et al.  The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism by Robert B. Reich (review) , 1993, Technology and Culture.

[50]  J. E. Swiss.  Adapting Total Quality Management (TQM) to Government. , 1992 .

[51]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  The Politics of the Budgetary Process. , 1965 .

[52]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[53]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  Rules and order , 1973 .