University-Industry cooperation: an analysis on the co-generated patents in Italy

The academic research system shows a significant increase in the generation of new patents, but the capacity to transfer these patents to firms interested in their economic exploitation is still limited. It is therefore interesting to investigate the factors affecting firms' involvement in the academic research that could lead to patentable results. Drawing on data from a sample of 282 patents from academic inventors of seven Italian universities, this paper focuses on four possible drivers of university-industry collaboration: a) the quality of the academic inventors' basic research; b) their propensy for the applied research; c) the innovative capability of the regional industrial system; d) the existence of local technology clusters. The results suggest that factors relating to the local industrial environment play a significant role in favoring firms' involvement in academic patents. In addition, a greater propensity of the researchers to applied research attracts firms' interest, while the quality of the basic research does not seem to affect firms' decisions to collaborate.

[1]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology , 2007 .

[2]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems , 2011 .

[3]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[4]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  Patents and the Geographic Localization of R&D Spillovers in French Manufacturing , 2001 .

[5]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[6]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[7]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[9]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  The Keins Database on Academic Inventors: Methodology and Contents , 2006 .

[10]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[11]  Fabio Pugini,et al.  L'attività di licensing delle università italiane: un'indagine empirica , 2005 .

[12]  R. Parente,et al.  La governance pubblica dei distretti tecnologici , 2011 .

[13]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors , 2008 .

[14]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Who is Selling the Ivory Tower , 2000 .

[15]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[16]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation , 2007 .

[17]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[18]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Wei-Kan Chu,et al.  University-Industry Research Collaboration , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[21]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[22]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  A Guide to Modern Econometrics , 2000 .

[23]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada , 2008 .

[24]  Alessandro Muscio.  Il trasferimento tecnologico in Italia: risultati di un’indagine sui dipartimenti universitari , 2008 .

[25]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[26]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[27]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[28]  F. Lissoni.  Academic inventors as brokers , 2010 .

[29]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .

[30]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[31]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[32]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[33]  What is the Best Policy for Innovative Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[34]  F. Lissoni,et al.  L'attività brevettuale dei docenti universitari: l'Italia in un confronto internazionale , 2007 .

[35]  J. Lerner,et al.  Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed--And What to Do about It , 2009 .

[36]  Grant Lewison,et al.  The classification of biomedical journals by research level , 2004, Scientometrics.

[37]  K. Tornquist,et al.  Out of the Ivory Tower: Characteristics of Institutions Meeting the Research Needs of Industry. , 1994 .

[38]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[39]  A. Jaffe.  The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[40]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[41]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  The Economic Valuation of Patents , 2011 .

[43]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .

[44]  M. G Colombo,et al.  Le start-ups accademiche: Teoria ed evidenza empirica sul caso italiano , 2008 .

[45]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006, Scientometrics.

[46]  Rinaldo Evangelista,et al.  Looking for Regional Systems of Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Innovation Survey , 2002 .

[47]  F. Lissoni,et al.  Brevetti universitari ed economomia della ricerca in Italia, Europa e Stati Uniti. Una rassegna dell'evidenza recente , 2006 .

[48]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .