Narrowband multivariate source separation for semi-blind discovery of experiment contrasts

Background Electrophysiological recordings contain mixtures of signals from distinct neural sources, impeding a straightforward interpretation of the sensor-level data. This mixing is particularly detrimental when distinct sources resonate in overlapping frequencies. Fortunately, the mixing is linear and instantaneous. Multivariate source separation methods may therefore successfully separate statistical sources, even with overlapping spatial distributions. New Method We demonstrate a feature-guided multivariate source separation method that is tuned to narrowband frequency content as well as binary condition differences. This method — comparison scanning generalized eigendecomposition, csGED — harnesses the covariance structure of multichannel data to find directions (i.e., eigenvectors) that maximally separate two subsets of data. To drive condition specificity and frequency specificity, our data subsets were taken from different task conditions and narrowband-filtered prior to applying GED. Results To validate the method, we simulated MEG data in two conditions with shared noise characteristics and unique signal. csGED outperformed the best sensor at reconstructing the ground truth signals, even in the presence of large amounts of noise. We next applied csGED to a published empirical MEG dataset on visual perception vs. imagery. csGED identified sources in alpha, beta, and gamma bands, and successfully separated distinct networks in the same frequency band. Comparison with Existing Method(s) GED is a flexible feature-guided decomposition method that has previously successfully been applied. Our combined frequency- and condition-tuning is a novel adaptation that extends the power of GED in cognitive electrophysiology. Conclusions We demonstrate successful condition-specific source separation by applying csGED to simulated and empirical data.

[1]  Marrit B. Zuure,et al.  Multiple Midfrontal Thetas Revealed by Source Separation of Simultaneous MEG and EEG , 2020, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[3]  Pim Mostert,et al.  Differential temporal dynamics during visual imagery and perception , 2018, eLife.

[4]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[5]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  Jian Yang,et al.  Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[8]  René J. Huster,et al.  A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG , 2017, Brain Topography.

[9]  J. Cardoso,et al.  Blind beamforming for non-gaussian signals , 1993 .

[10]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Multivariate cross-frequency coupling via generalized eigendecomposition , 2017, bioRxiv.

[11]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  Scanning for oscillations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[13]  Mark Stokes,et al.  Temporally Unconstrained Decoding Reveals Consistent but Time-Varying Stages of Stimulus Processing , 2018, bioRxiv.

[14]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website , 2019, NeuroImage.

[15]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Extracting spatial–temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  A. Lueschow,et al.  The face-responsive M170 is modulated by sensor selection: An example of circularity in the analysis of MEG-data , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  SPoC: A novel framework for relating the amplitude of neuronal oscillations to behaviorally relevant parameters , 2014, NeuroImage.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Effects of Visual Stimulation and Selective Visual Attention on Rhythmic Neuronal Synchronization in Macaque Area V4 , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Comparison of linear spatial filters for identifying oscillatory activity in multichannel data , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  Sander Erik Bosch,et al.  Shared Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Imagery , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Floris P. de Lange,et al.  Differential temporal dynamics during visual imagery and perception , 2017, bioRxiv.

[23]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[24]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  Ying Guo,et al.  A hierarchical independent component analysis model for longitudinal neuroimaging studies , 2018, NeuroImage.

[26]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Michael X. Cohen A data-driven method to identify frequency boundaries in multichannel electrophysiology data , 2021, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  W. Klimesch The frequency architecture of brain and brain body oscillations: an analysis , 2018, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  ZapLine: A simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts , 2019, NeuroImage.

[30]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  Measure projection analysis: A probabilistic approach to EEG source comparison and multi-subject inference , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[32]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Wronka,et al.  On the locus of the effect of alerting on response conflict: An event-related EEG study with a speed-accuracy tradeoff manipulation , 2019, Biological Psychology.

[34]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Correlated Components Analysis - Extracting Reliable Dimensions in Multivariate Data , 2018, Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis, and Theory.

[35]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[36]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[38]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory , 2005, NeuroImage.

[39]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.