Microbial Antagonism Toward Botrytis Bunch Rot of Grapes in Multiple Field Tests Using One Bacillus ginsengihumi Strain and Formulated Biological Control Products

Botrytis bunch rot (BBR), caused by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, is a major disease of wine and table grapes worldwide. Due to negative effects of pesticides on the environment and human health, alternative control strategies against BBR, such as biological control agents (BCAs), are required to produce high-quality grapes and wines with high standards of food safety. However, few biological control products against BBR are available, and their efficacy is sometimes variable. This study aimed to evaluate and compare (1) the efficacy of new bacterial BCA strains developed at INRA Bordeaux and (2) the BBR reductions achieved by commercial biocontrol products that are already registered or close to being registered. During three consecutive seasons, 10 field experiments were established in six different experimental vineyards in southwestern France. Spray applications were performed at key phenological stages (five or six during the season), or at high BBR-risk periods late in the season according to a Disease Risk Index model. At harvest, BBR incidence and severity (% of symptomatic berries per bunch) were visually determined. The experiments included four bacterial strains at an early experimental stage, particularly Bacillus ginsengihumi (S38). Nine commercial BCA products were also tested, including Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Aureobasidium pullulans, Ulocladium oudemansii, and Candida sake. Among the four experimental bacterial strains, only B. ginsengihumi S38 significantly controlled the BBR, presenting reductions in the average severity ranging from 35 to 60%, compared to untreated control, throughout the three seasons. Several commercial BCAs achieved significant reductions in BBR severity ranging from 21 to 58%, although not in every trial. The treatments that achieved higher reductions in severity rates were based on C. sake (45%), B. subtilis (54%), and B. amyloliquefaciens (58%). The efficacy of those BCAs was consistent throughout the studied seasons. The results confirmed the suitability of several biological control products under the conditions in vineyards in southwestern France, while also highlighting the good performance of the novel experimental BCA B. ginsengihumi S38 strain, which achieved similar control rates to the products registered for commercial use. The major factors involved in the variability in the results are also discussed.

[1]  M. Fermaud,et al.  Pre-selection in laboratory tests of survival and competition before field screening of antagonistic bacterial strains against Botrytis bunch rot of grapes , 2018, Biological Control.

[2]  C. Acevedo-Opazo,et al.  Classification of winegrape cultivars in Chile and France according to their susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea related to fruit maturity , 2018 .

[3]  F. Faretra,et al.  Use of biocontrol agents and botanicals in integrated management of Botrytis cinerea in table grape vineyards. , 2018, Pest management science.

[4]  Louise M. Nelson,et al.  Mechanisms of action of three isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens active against postharvest grey mold decay of apple during commercial storage , 2018 .

[5]  K. Rohr,et al.  Phenotypic memory in Bacillus subtilis links dormancy entry and exit by a spore quantity-quality tradeoff , 2018, Nature Communications.

[6]  A. Ambrico,et al.  Efficacy of cell free supernatant from Bacillus subtilis ET-1, an Iturin A producer strain, on biocontrol of green and gray mold , 2017 .

[7]  C. Casals,et al.  Biological control of brown rot in stone fruit using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA-8 under field conditions , 2017 .

[8]  V. Villegas-Escobar,et al.  Biocontrol activity of Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0015 cells and lipopeptides against postharvest fungal pathogens , 2017 .

[9]  V. Rossi,et al.  Combining biocontrol agents with different mechanisms of action in a strategy to control Botrytis cinerea on grapevine , 2017 .

[10]  J. Lamichhane Pesticide use and risk reduction in European farming systems with IPM: An introduction to the special issue , 2017 .

[11]  M. S. Grando,et al.  A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture , 2017 .

[12]  M. E. Venturini,et al.  Potential of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BUZ-14 as a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases. , 2017, Food microbiology.

[13]  G. Venturini,et al.  Competition assays revealed Paenibacillus pasadenensis strain R16 as a novel antifungal agent. , 2017, Microbiological research.

[14]  J. Usall,et al.  Effective control of Botrytis bunch rot in commercial vineyards by large-scale application of Candida sake CPA-1 , 2017, BioControl.

[15]  O. Bonnard,et al.  Screening and modes of action of antagonistic bacteria to control the fungal pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora involved in grapevine trunk diseases. , 2016, Microbiological research.

[16]  T. Thomidis,et al.  Evaluation of Serenade Max to Control Fruit Rot of Grapes , 2016 .

[17]  M. Fermaud,et al.  Modes of action for biological control of Botrytis cinerea by antagonistic bacteria , 2016 .

[18]  D. Vitali Čepo,et al.  Novel multiresidue method for determination of pesticides in red wine using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and solid phase extraction. , 2016, Food chemistry.

[19]  A. Upadhyay,et al.  Biocontrol potential of two novel grapevine associated Bacillus strains for management of anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides , 2016 .

[20]  A. Chiralt,et al.  Effect of different coating-forming agents on the efficacy of the biocontrol agent Candida sake CPA-1 for control of Botrytis cinerea on grapes , 2016 .

[21]  A. Abad‐Somovilla,et al.  Fungicide multiresidue monitoring in international wines by immunoassays. , 2016, Food chemistry.

[22]  M. Mari,et al.  Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action? , 2016, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[23]  M. Mari,et al.  Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action? , 2016, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[24]  F. Faretra,et al.  Genetics of Botrytis cinerea , 2016 .

[25]  S. Fillinger,et al.  Botrytis , the Good, the Bad and the Ugly , 2016 .

[26]  S. Fillinger,et al.  Chemical Control and Resistance Management of Botrytis Diseases , 2016 .

[27]  Y. Elad,et al.  Biological Control and Biopesticide Suppression of Botrytis -Incited Diseases , 2016 .

[28]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Toward a Reduced Reliance on Conventional Pesticides in European Agriculture. , 2016, Plant disease.

[29]  M. Fermaud,et al.  Multi-organ screening of efficient bacterial control agents against two major pathogens of grapevine , 2016 .

[30]  C. Clément,et al.  Effectiveness of beneficial bacteria to promote systemic resistance of grapevine to gray mold as related to phytoalexin production in vineyards , 2015, Plant and Soil.

[31]  C. Bertsch,et al.  Bacteria in a wood fungal disease: characterization of bacterial communities in wood tissues of esca-foliar symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevines , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[32]  V. Rossi,et al.  A Mechanistic Model of Botrytis cinerea on Grapevines That Includes Weather, Vine Growth Stage, and the Main Infection Pathways , 2015, PloS one.

[33]  V. Rossi,et al.  Environmental Conditions Affect Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries More Than the Strain or Transposon Genotype. , 2015, Phytopathology.

[34]  Paolo Bàrberi,et al.  Eight principles of integrated pest management , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[35]  B. Alsanius,et al.  Control of Botrytis cinerea in strawberries by biological control agents applied as single or combined treatments , 2015, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[36]  J. Usall,et al.  Survival of the biological control agent Candida sake CPA‐1 on grapes under the influence of abiotic factors , 2014, Journal of applied microbiology.

[37]  J. Usall,et al.  Potential secondary inoculum sources of Botrytis cinerea and their influence on bunch rot development in dry Mediterranean climate vineyards. , 2014, Pest management science.

[38]  M. Hahn The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi: Botrytis as a case study , 2014, Journal of chemical biology.

[39]  J. Usall,et al.  Mode of action of a fatty acid–based natural product to control Botrytis cinerea in grapes , 2014, Journal of applied microbiology.

[40]  F. Čuš,et al.  Analytical determination of Dolenjska region wines quality , 2013 .

[41]  A. Lonvaud,et al.  Characterization of Epiphytic Bacterial Communities from Grapes, Leaves, Bark and Soil of Grapevine Plants Grown, and Their Relations , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  J. Usall,et al.  Biological control of botrytis bunch rot in organic wine grapes with the yeast antagonist Candida sake CPA‐1 , 2013 .

[43]  P. Leroux,et al.  French vineyards provide information that opens ways for effective resistance management of Botrytis cinerea (grey mould). , 2013, Pest management science.

[44]  J. Blackman,et al.  Grapevine bunch rots: impacts on wine composition, quality, and potential procedures for the removal of wine faults. , 2013, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[45]  I. Sârbu,et al.  Antagonistic Activity of Three Newly Isolated Yeast Strains from the Surface of Fruits , 2013 .

[46]  M. Coleman,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation into the Impact of a Pesticide Combination on Human Neuronal and Glial Cell Lines In Vitro , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  B. Donèche,et al.  Assessment of grey mould (Botrytis cinerea) impact on phenolic and sensory quality of Bordeaux grapes, musts and wines for two consecutive vintages , 2012 .

[48]  Y. Elad,et al.  Effect of temperature on microbial biocontrol agents of plant diseases , 2012 .

[49]  M. Jijakli,et al.  UV protectants for Candida oleophila (strain O), a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases , 2011 .

[50]  S. Marín,et al.  Potential of a new strain of Bacillus subtilis CPA-8 to control the major postharvest diseases of fruit , 2011 .

[51]  A. Kortenkamp,et al.  Widely Used Pesticides with Previously Unknown Endocrine Activity Revealed as in Vitro Antiandrogens , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[52]  C. Alabouvette,et al.  Chapter 1: Potential of biological control based on published research. 1. Protection against plant pathogens of selected crops , 2011 .

[53]  F. Baruzzi,et al.  Antimicrobial compounds produced by Bacillus spp. and applications in food , 2011 .

[54]  P. Melgarejo,et al.  Enhancing the adhesion of Epicoccum nigrum conidia to peach surfaces and its relationship to the biocontrol of brown rot caused by Monilinia laxa , 2010, Journal of applied microbiology.

[55]  Lili Huang,et al.  Resistance to thiabendazole and baseline sensitivity to fludioxonil and pyrimethanil in Botrytis cinerea populations from apple and pear in Washington State , 2010 .

[56]  J. Bollinger,et al.  Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: a review of environmental and toxicological aspects. , 2010, Environment international.

[57]  W. Gubler,et al.  Evaluation of fungicide programs for management of Botrytis bunch rot of grapes: 2010 field trial , 2009 .

[58]  Rajbir Singh,et al.  Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review , 2009 .

[59]  A. Economou,et al.  Determination of multi-class pesticides in wines by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[60]  Marc Fermaud,et al.  Grape berry skin features related to ontogenic resistance to Botrytis cinerea , 2009, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[61]  F. Regner,et al.  Investigations into botrytis control in organic-biological viticulture. , 2009 .

[62]  M. Ongena,et al.  Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[63]  D. Mundy,et al.  Susceptibility of grapes to Botrytis cinerea in relation to berry nitrogen and sugar concentration , 2007 .

[64]  P. Leroux Chemical Control of Botrytis and its Resistance to Chemical Fungicides , 2007 .

[65]  L. Korsten,et al.  Bacillus subtilis attachment, colonization, and survival on avocado flowers and its mode of action on stem-end rot pathogens , 2006 .

[66]  P. Elmer,et al.  Biosuppression of Botrytis cinerea in grapes , 2006 .

[67]  G. Qin,et al.  Combination of antagonistic yeasts with two food additives for control of brown rot caused by Monilinia fructicola on sweet cherry fruit , 2006, Journal of applied microbiology.

[68]  C. Meyer Message in a bottle. , 2020, Minnesota medicine.

[69]  B. Deng,et al.  Biological control of Penicillium italicum of Citrus and Botrytis cinerea of Grape by Strain 34–9 of Kloeckera apiculata , 2005 .

[70]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  Influence of food additives on the control of postharvest rots of apple and peach and efficacy of the yeast-based biocontrol product aspire , 2003 .

[71]  J. Wise,et al.  Evaluation of environmentally friendly products for control of fungal diseases of grapes. , 2002 .

[72]  N. Magan,et al.  Physiological approaches to improving the ecological fitness of fungal biocontrol agents. , 2001 .

[73]  I. Barchia,et al.  Significance of carry over inoculum, flower infection and latency on the incidence of Botrytis cinerea in berries of grapevines at harvest in New South Wales , 1995 .

[74]  W. Gerrard Effect of Temperature , 1976 .

[75]  R. Kitney,et al.  Biological Control , 1973, Nature.