Timing of goal-directed hitting: impact requirements change the information–movement coupling

In hitting, performers are found to adapt to the approach speed of the ball, i.e. they tend to initiate their movement at a shorter time before contact for faster approaching balls. A change in movement time is always accompanied by a change in movement velocity when the movement trajectory is kept constant. Hence, a fast-approaching ball might induce high impact velocity that is in conflict with low impact constraints, such as propelling the ball towards a near goal. In this study we investigated the capacities of participants to perform one-dimensional hitting movements in the frontal plane to balls approaching on a head-on collision course. The temporal precision (i.e. ball approach speed: 1, 1.5, and 2 m/s) and impact requirements (i.e. No-Goal, Near-Goal, and Far-Goal) were manipulated to examine the influence of task constraints on the temporal regulation of a stroke. The results showed that timing and speed were significantly affected by ball approach speed when the hit was not directed to a goal. In contrast, no speed-coupling and a constant time-to-impact strategy were found when impact velocity was constrained (i.e. aiming for a near goal). We were particularly interested in the nature and relation of information sources and timing patterns of movement initiation. Therefore, the relation between the time evolution of three optical sources related to the approach of the ball and the observed patterns of swing onset were evaluated quantitatively. The analyses revealed that a viable explanation for the two observed qualitatively different onset patterns of the swing is a regulation based on the absolute rate of expansion or a co-varying variable. The flexible adaptation of timing to impact constraints may be realized by an adjustment of the critical region of this optical variable.

[1]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  G. J. Savelsbergh,et al.  Grasping tau. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R J Bootsma,et al.  The effects of task constraints on the organization of interception movements. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  Hubert Ripoll,et al.  Time-to-contact estimation of accelerated stimuli is based on first-order information. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  R. Christina,et al.  Psychology of motor behavior and sport , 1978 .

[7]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Perception-action coupling in hitting and catching. , 1994 .

[8]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[10]  J. Tresilian,et al.  a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude , 2022 .

[11]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Chapter 3 Building blocks for time-to-contact estimation by the brain , 2004 .

[12]  E Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving objects. The dependency of hand velocity on the speed of the target. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[13]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Dynamic theory of action-perception patterns: The time-before-contact paradigm , 1994 .

[14]  H. Wagner Flow-field variables trigger landing in flies , 1982, Nature.

[15]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Prospective control of manual interceptive actions: comparative simulations of extant and new model constructs , 2001, Neural Networks.

[16]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[17]  E Brenner,et al.  Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D Regan,et al.  Visual factors in hitting and catching. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  S Bennett,et al.  Timing a one-handed catch. I. Effects of telestereoscopic viewing. , 1999, Experimental brain research.

[20]  C. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in punching a falling ball , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  Alfred W. Hubbard,et al.  Visual Movements of Batters , 1954 .

[23]  G. J. K. Alderson,et al.  An operational analysis of a one-handed catching task using high speed photography. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  Timing structure in squash strokes: Further evidence for the operational timing hypothesis , 1988 .

[26]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar function: Coordination, learning or timing? , 2000, Current Biology.

[27]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  J. van der Kamp,et al.  Catching optical information for the regulation of timing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[30]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Temporal precision of interceptive action: differential effects of target size and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  D. Robertson,et al.  The kinematics, movement phasing and timing of a skilled action in response to varying conditions of uncertainty , 1985 .

[32]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Revised tau hypothesis : A consideration of Wann's (1996) analyses , 1997 .

[33]  Rob Gray,et al.  Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.