CO-PrOx reactor design by model-based optimization

Abstract This work analyzes the CO-PrOx reactor design as a component of the CO clean-up system of the ethanol processor for H 2 production applied to PEM fuel cells. The operating conditions of the processor require compact and lightweight pieces of equipment and efficient operation at different conditions. An egg-shell catalyst type of Pt/Al 2 O 3 is considered. One-dimensional heterogeneous catalytic reactor model accounting for interfacial gradients is used to optimize the PrOx reactor. Different reactor components are added gradually to illustrate how the system dimensions and configuration change after optimization. The optimization problem determines the optimal reactor length, reactor diameter, catalyst particle diameter, inlet reactants temperature and insulating material thickness that minimize the total system volume. On these model-based results, the final reactor design is mainly governed by the presence of hemispherical heads (distributor and collector). Different inlet CO compositions and power generation targets are analyzed. According to the inlet CO level, more than one catalytic stage is required to meet design goals and fulfill process constraints. The model-based reactor optimization of the pseudo-adiabatic operation allows obtaining both designs for reducing volumes and optimal operating conditions that allows conventional reactor technology. Afterwards, simulation runs based on a rigorous one-dimensional heterogeneous catalytic reactor model accounting for intra-particle gradients are performed using data obtained from model-based optimization results. The aim of these simulations is to verify feasibility of the optimal design obtained from the proposed one-dimensional heterogeneous catalytic reactor model without intra-particle gradients, which is intended to approximate an egg-shell catalyst behavior. The present work reflects clearly the advantages of applying mathematical programming techniques to optimize both design and operation conditions of the PrOx reactor.

[1]  Pio A. Aguirre,et al.  Analysis of design variables for water-gas-shift reactors by model-based optimization , 2007 .

[2]  J. Levec,et al.  Kinetics of selective CO oxidation in excess of H2 over the nanostructured Cu0.1Ce0.9O2-y catalyst , 2003 .

[3]  G. Froment,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design , 1979 .

[4]  Edward J. Bissett,et al.  PrOx reactor model for fuel cell feedstream processing , 2005 .

[5]  M. Echigo.  A study of CO removal on an activated Ru catalyst for polymer electrolyte fuel cell applications , 2003 .

[6]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Kinetics of the Selective Low-Temperature Oxidation of CO in H2-Rich Gas over Au/α-Fe2O3 , 1999 .

[7]  Charles N. Satterfield,et al.  Mass transfer in heterogeneous catalysis , 1969 .

[8]  Dong Hyun Kim,et al.  Kinetics of selective CO oxidation in hydrogen-rich mixtures on Pt/alumina catalysts , 2002 .

[9]  G. Somorjai,et al.  Heats of Chemisorption of O2, H2, CO, CO2, and N2 on Polycrystalline and Single Crystal Transition Metal Surfaces , 1979 .

[10]  R. Besser,et al.  Effect of reactor heat transfer limitations on CO preferential oxidation , 2005 .

[11]  E. J. Bissett,et al.  Pt surface kinetics for a PrOx reactor for fuel cell feedstream processing , 2005 .

[12]  Hongmei Xie,et al.  Non-noble metal catalyst for carbon monoxide selective oxidation in excess hydrogen , 2005 .

[13]  J. M. Zalc,et al.  Fuel processing for PEM fuel cells: transport and kinetic issues of system design , 2002 .

[14]  Development of 10-kWe preferential oxidation system for fuel cell vehicles , 2002 .

[15]  R. Farrauto,et al.  Selective catalytic oxidation of CO in H2: fuel cell applications , 2000 .

[16]  Rui Chen,et al.  Evaluation and modelling of a CO selective oxidation reactor for solid polymer fuel cell automotive applications , 2000 .

[17]  L. F. Brown.  A comparative study of fuels for on-board hydrogen production for fuel-cell-powered automobiles , 2001 .

[18]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[19]  D. Ziółkowski,et al.  Stochastic approach to modelling and analysing of gas flow field in tubes packed randomly with spherical catalyst pellets , 2005 .

[20]  Takeshi Tabata,et al.  Development of novel Ru catalyst of preferential CO oxidation for residential polymer electrolyte fuel cell systems , 2004 .

[21]  Erdogan Gulari,et al.  A scalable silicon microreactor for preferential CO oxidation: performance comparison with a tubular packed-bed microreactor , 2004 .

[22]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Correlation between CO surface coverage and selectivity/kinetics for the preferential CO oxidation over Pt/γ-Al2O3 and Au/α-Fe2O3: an in-situ DRIFTS study , 1999 .

[23]  R. Sinkevitch,et al.  Carbon Monoxide Removal from Hydrogen-Rich Fuel Cell Feedstreams by Selective Catalytic Oxidation , 1993 .

[24]  Harvey G. Stenger,et al.  Kinetics, simulation and insights for CO selective oxidation in fuel cell applications , 2004 .

[25]  K. Hirai,et al.  Development of residential PEFC cogeneration systems: Ru catalyst for CO preferential oxidation in reformed gas , 2003 .

[26]  Sungwon Hwang,et al.  Heterogeneous catalytic reactor design with optimum temperature profile I: application of catalyst dilution and side-stream distribution , 2004 .

[27]  Rui Chen,et al.  A carbon monoxide PROX reactor for PEM fuel cell automotive application , 2001 .

[28]  P. C. Hulteberg,et al.  Preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide on mounted and unmounted noble-metal catalysts in hydrogen-rich streams , 2005 .

[29]  A. Varma,et al.  Chemical Reaction and Reactor Engineering , 1986 .

[30]  John P. Kopasz,et al.  Fuel processing for fuel cell systems in transportation and portable power applications , 2002 .