Use of OGC web standard for a spatio-temporal enabled SDI for civil protection

In the last years, Geographic Information technologies have reached a mature state, providing a platform to support interoperability among different providers and users through Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI). However, Civil Protection applications have specific requirements that make them different from typical Earth System Sciences research applications. Currently SDIs and the ESDI (European Spatial Data Infrastructure) only partially address user needs as they offer no or very limited time variable management. The main objective of the work presented here, which presents the achievements of the EU project BRISEIDE, was to develop a complete software architecture in that could provide the user with the possibility to interact with geographic spatio-temporal information through a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). The challenge is to define a complex architecture, which is able to provide several kinds of geographic services (images, multidimensional raster data, sensor information, features and processing features) in a unique 2D/3D environment allowing the user to easily interact with the web services and functions. The deployed services enable sharing of geospatial information even with temporal dimension, a fundamental requirement for Civil Protection applications. The services are accessible through a multi-platform 3D client, developed during the project, which also allows interactive orchestration of spatio-temporal WPSs (Web Processing Services) by providing support to chaining of required processing units.

[1]  Li Qi,et al.  The relation of department components and activity in Spatial Information Infrastructure , 2009, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[2]  Alessandro Annoni,et al.  Towards The Implementation of the European Spatial Data Infrastructure - Getting the Process Right , 2004 .

[3]  Gregory Giuliani,et al.  The PREVIEW Global Risk Data Platform: a geoportal to serve and share global data on risk to natural hazards , 2011 .

[4]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Investigation of user requirements in the emergency response sector: the Dutch case , 2006 .

[5]  T. H. Kolbe,et al.  CityGML – 3D City Models and their Potential for Emergency Response , 2008 .

[6]  Graeme McFerren,et al.  Evaluating Sensor Observation Service implementations , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[7]  John Davidson,et al.  Ogc® sensor web enablement:overview and high level achhitecture. , 2007, 2007 IEEE Autotestcon.

[8]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  Spatial Data Infrastructure for Emergency Response in Netherlands , 2008 .

[9]  George Percivall,et al.  Ogc® sensor web enablement:overview and high level achhitecture. , 2007 .

[10]  Giuseppe Conti,et al.  AN INTEGRATED FRAMEW ORK FOR SPATIO-TEMPORAL DATA MANAGEMENT : THE PROJECT BRISEIDE – BRIDGING SERVICES INFORMATIO N AND DATA FOR EUROPE , 2010 .

[11]  Richard Groot,et al.  Geospatial Data Infrastructure : Concepts, Cases, and Good Practice , 2000 .

[12]  P. V. Oosterom,et al.  GEO-INFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT , 2008 .