Monozukuri capability to address product variety: A comparison between Japanese and German automotive makers

[1]  Paul Hong,et al.  An effective integration of manufacturing and marketing system for long production cycle: A case study of Toyota Motor Company , 2011 .

[2]  Joe Miemczyk,et al.  Theoretical versus actual product variety: How much customisation do customers really demand? , 2011 .

[3]  Martin Christopher,et al.  “Supply Chain 2.0”: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence , 2011 .

[4]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  Mass Customization in the Automotive Industry: Comparing Interdealer Trading and Reconfiguration Flexibilities in Order Fulfillment , 2010 .

[5]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  Mass Customization in the Automotive Industry: Comparing Interdealer Trading and Reconfiguration Flexibilities in Order Fulfillment: Mass Customization in the Automotive Industry , 2010 .

[6]  Paul Hong,et al.  Market flexible customizing system (MFCS) of Japanese vehicle manufacturers: An analysis of Toyota, Nissan and Mitsubishi , 2009 .

[7]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  On the impact of order volatility in the European automotive sector , 2008 .

[8]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Co‐located supplier clusters: forms, functions and theoretical perspectives , 2008 .

[9]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage — A Design Information View of Manufacturing , 2007 .

[10]  M. Holweg,et al.  Creating the customer‐responsive supply chain: a reconciliation of concepts , 2007 .

[11]  Allard Droste.  Lean thinking, banish waste and create wealth in your corporation , 2007 .

[12]  Peter Fredriksson,et al.  Mechanisms and Rationales for the Coordination of a Modular Assembly System: The Case of Volvo Cars , 2006 .

[13]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The Second Century: Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain through Build-to-Order Moving beyond Mass and Lean Production in the Auto Industry , 2005 .

[14]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Towards responsive vehicle supply: a simulation-based investigation into automotive scheduling systems , 2005 .

[15]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The three dimensions of responsiveness , 2005 .

[16]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Linking Product Variety to Order-Fulfillment Strategies , 2004, Interfaces.

[17]  Herbert Meyr,et al.  Supply chain planning in the German automotive industry , 2004, OR Spectr..

[18]  Kamalini Ramdas.  MANAGING PRODUCT VARIETY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS , 2003 .

[19]  Anders Larsson.  The development and regional significance of the automotive industry: supplier parks in western Europe , 2002 .

[20]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota , 1999 .

[21]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  The Impact of Product Variety on Automobile Assembly Operations: Empirical Evidence and Simulation Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  William P. Putsis,et al.  Product Proliferation: An Empirical Analysis of Product Line Determinants and Market Outcomes , 1999 .

[23]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[24]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Product variety and manufacturing performance: evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study , 1996 .

[25]  Yasuhiro Monden,et al.  Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time , 1993 .

[26]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[27]  K. Lancaster.  The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey , 1990 .

[28]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[29]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Genesis of Configuration , 1987 .

[30]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[31]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[32]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[33]  Manuel E. Sosa,et al.  On-Line Supplement To: The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004 .

[34]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .