Leading knowledge management in a secondary school

Purpose This paper aims to explore the influence of a principal’s leadership in kicking off knowledge management (KM) implementation and the following KM processes in the school. The author tries to propose a model of knowledge leadership for principals to adopt at the beginning of KM journey and during the process of KM implementation. The paper shares the lessons learned during the process of implementation: what he has done and what should be improved. Thus, this paper can provide a model for school principals to implement KM in their schools. This paper also sheds light for KM researchers about the issue of leadership during KM implementation. Design/methodology/approach The study uses an action research (AR) to explore how the principal’s leadership can enhance KM implementation in a school environment and evaluates the effectiveness of the knowledge leadership framework for KM implementation in a school setting. An insider AR methodology was adopted to study and reflect on the processes of KM implementation and lessons learned. Multiple data sources, including observations, questionnaires and interviews, have been collected for evaluation. Findings In this study, the principal kicked off KM in the school. It was found that KM “cannot” be implemented without the principal’s effective knowledge leadership. If there was only little KM leadership, such as the leadership in Stage 1, the launching of KM was found to be difficult. After awareness of the need of strengthening leadership in Stage 2, the principal exercised stronger leadership in pushing the KM process further, and the school had more obvious KM outcomes. Therefore, this study proves that leadership is essential for KM implementation, especially at the beginning of the KM processes. The principal acted as the knowledge leader with the roles of the knowledge vision builder, knowledge enabler builder and knowledge role model. The roles of knowledge leadership are found to be potent and critical for the process of KM implementation to facilitate sharing information/knowledge and nurturing a sharing culture and trust. In this study, the principal kicked off KM in the school. It was found that KM “cannot” be implemented without the principal’s effective knowledge leadership. If there was only little KM leadership, such as the leadership in Stage 1, launching KM was found to be difficult. After awareness of the need of strengthening leadership in Stage 2, the principal exercised stronger leadership in pushing the KM process further, and the school had more obvious KM outcomes. Therefore, this study proves that leadership is essential for KM implementation, especially at the beginning of the KM processes. The principal acted as the knowledge leader with the roles of knowledge vision builder, knowledge enabler builder and knowledge role model. The roles of knowledge leadership are found to be potent and critical for the process of KM implementation to facilitate sharing information/knowledge and nurturing a sharing culture and trust. Research limitations/implications Although the results of the study conducted in one school may not be generalized to other school contexts, the lessons learned in the study might be a reference to other schools for their future development. Because of his unique position as the principal in the researched school, the researcher adopted an insider approach generating value for investigation of KM implementation in this study, as there were multiple mediating processes through which leaders could influence school functioning, and, hence, knowledge sharing or other issues in KM implementation. Practical implications This study could contribute toward KM implementation in the public sector, especially in schools. Moreover, the approaches, the strategies, the processes and the challenges the principal and the school faced can shed light on practice and research for further KM implementation. In addition, although leadership has been commonly regarded as an important factor in KM implementation, few studies have explored the impact of leadership during the KM process. With the principal’s leadership as the main component, this study is important for an analysis of the role of leadership during the process. The framework of knowledge leadership adopted in this study has been tried and evaluated to be applicable and necessary for KM implementation in a school environment. Social implications Most people might think that KM can be applied only in the commercial sector. This study shows that KM can also be adopted in schools and in other sectors. Moreover, it shows that the principal’s leadership was the key driver for KM implementation. The principal’s leadership with clear direction and thoughtful procedures of implementing may be a showcase for the leaders in other sectors. Originality/value Fullan (2002) mentions the essence of KM in schools, the importance of principals’ leadership in the promotion of KM in schools, the moral purpose and knowledge sharing and leadership and sustainability, but he does not provide any practical suggestion for how principals can become knowledge leaders. Therefore, this paper hopes to further propose a model to show how to help a principal transform into a knowledge leader to overcome barriers and difficulties in kicking off KM at the beginning of their KM journey and during the process of KM implementation.

[1]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, And Performance , 2006 .

[2]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[3]  V. Anantatmula Leadership role in making effective use of KM , 2008 .

[4]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification , 2011 .

[5]  Robert John Parkes,et al.  Can schools realize the learning potential of knowledge management , 2006 .

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[7]  Alan Bain,et al.  Can schools realize the potential of knowledge management , 2006 .

[8]  Rune Lines,et al.  Influence of participation in strategic change: resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement , 2004 .

[9]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[10]  Joon Koh,et al.  An Integrative Model for Knowledge Sharing in Communities-of-Practice , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  R. Lipshitz,et al.  Installing mechanisms and instilling values: the role of leaders in organizational learning , 2000 .

[12]  Steven A. Cavaleri,et al.  Knowledge Leadership: The Art and Science of the Knowledge-based Organization , 2005 .

[13]  P. O’Toole,et al.  Applying a knowledge management taxonomy to secondary schools , 2012 .

[14]  J. Dirkx Invited reaction: Managers as facilitators of learning in learning organizations , 1999 .

[15]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[16]  Meliha Handzic,et al.  Integrated Socio-Technical Knowledge Management Model: An Empirical Evaluation , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[17]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[18]  J. Bratton,et al.  Leader‐follower dynamics: developing a learning environment , 2001 .

[19]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[21]  Aybüke Aurum,et al.  Knowledge management in software engineering - describing the process , 2004, 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings..

[22]  C. Long,et al.  Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage , 1995 .

[23]  R. Sanchez,et al.  Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management , 1997 .

[24]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Leadership Style and Organizational Learning: The Mediate Effect of School Vision. , 2010 .

[25]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Managerial coaching behaviors in learning organizations , 1999 .

[26]  E. Sallis,et al.  Knowledge Management in Education: Enhancing Learning & Education , 2001 .

[27]  M. Fullan The Role of Leadership in the Promotion of Knowledge Management in Schools , 2002 .

[28]  S. Reid Knowledge influencers: leaders influencing knowledge creation and mobilization , 2014 .

[29]  J. Burgoyne,et al.  The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[30]  Rivadávia Correa Drummond de Alvarenga Neto,et al.  Beyond the ba: managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Riitta Viitala,et al.  Towards knowledge leadership , 2004 .

[32]  D. Payne,et al.  Teacher Professional Development—The Principal's Critical Role , 2000 .

[33]  S. Piderit Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change , 2000 .

[34]  Allan H. K. Yuen,et al.  Implementing Knowledge Management in School Environment: Teachers' Perception , 2011 .

[35]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[36]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Theory of the Knowledge-Creating Firm: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Synthesis , 2005 .

[37]  P. Senge The leader's new work: Building learning organizations. , 1998 .

[38]  Eppen Gd,et al.  Bundling--new products, new markets, low risk. , 1991 .

[39]  Stephen T. Kerr,et al.  Knowledge management support for teachers , 2003 .

[40]  Jack Whitehead,et al.  All you need to know about action research , 2006 .

[41]  Yu-Cheng Lin,et al.  Developing project communities of practice-based knowledge management system in construction , 2012 .

[42]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[43]  C. Lakshman Knowledge Leadership: Tools for Executive Leaders , 2008 .

[44]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[45]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[46]  R. Noe,et al.  Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems , 2014 .

[47]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management , 2000 .

[48]  Robert V. Labaree The risk of ‘going observationalist’: negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer , 2002 .

[49]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[50]  Steven A. Cavaleri,et al.  Chapter 1 – The Knowledge Leadership Challenge , 2005 .

[51]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[52]  Wallace H. Hannum Knowledge management in education: Helping teachers to work better , 2001 .

[53]  Kimiz Dalkir,et al.  Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[54]  C. MacNeil,et al.  The supervisor as a facilitator of informal learning in work teams , 2001 .

[55]  D. Lortie Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study , 1976 .

[56]  Alan R. Peslak,et al.  The Importance of Information Technology: An Empirical and Longitudinal Study of the Annual Reports of the 50 Largest Companies in the United States , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations , 1991 .

[58]  R. Merton Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[60]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[61]  V. Kanuha "Being" native versus "going native": conducting social work research as an insider. , 2000, Social work.

[62]  S. Printy,et al.  Leadership for Teacher Learning: A Community of Practice Perspective , 2008 .

[63]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[64]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[65]  Catherine Lewis,et al.  How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement? The Case of Lesson Study , 2006 .

[66]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[67]  Chi-Hong Leung Critical Factors of Implementing Knowledge Management in School Environment: A Qualitative Study in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[68]  D. Waldman,et al.  Leadership, behavioral context, and the performance of work groups in a knowledge-intensive setting , 2010 .

[69]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[70]  Dev Raj Adhikari,et al.  Knowledge management in academic institutions , 2010 .