Does size matter? An investigation into the role of virtual team size in IT service provisioning

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential influence of virtual team size on team performance by examining group processes in the context of information technology (IT) service provisioning. This paper proposes a theoretical model of the relationships and presents an empirical study to verify the model. Design/methodology/approach Utilizing a survey questionnaire as the data collection instrument, this study focuses on IT service provisioning professionals who are actively engaged in virtual work contexts to test the relationships proposed by the theoretical model. A consistent version of the partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach is used to assess the proposed hypotheses. Findings Although the statistical analyses did not provide support for the hypothesized effects of team size on virtual team performance, the results provide novel insights that may help teams overcome the functioning challenges that they face, as reported in the previous literature on virtual team size. In addition, the results highlight the importance of specific group processes for obtaining superior team performance. Originality/value Currently, virtual teams are a reality in several organizations, especially in the IT service provisioning industry. However, despite its importance, the literature suggests that virtual team size has not yet been fully explored as a possible means of enhancing group collaboration in such contexts. This paper attempts to provide an empirical contribution to this field using the latest developments in PLS-SEM.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[2]  C. Shalley,et al.  A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes , 2004 .

[3]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[4]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Minder Chen,et al.  E-leadership effectiveness in virtual teams: motivating language perspective , 2014, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[6]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[7]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[8]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[9]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Evolving Relationship Structures in Multi-sourcing Arrangements: The Case of Mission Critical Outsourcing , 2010, Global Sourcing Workshop.

[12]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[13]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  When culture and style aren't about clothes: perceptions of task-technology "fit" in global virtual teams , 2001, GROUP.

[14]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Are All Distributed Teams the Same? Differentiating Between Temporary and Ongoing Distributed Teams , 2006 .

[15]  Min Liu,et al.  The Effects of Electronic Collaboration in Distributed Project Management , 2006 .

[16]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[17]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups , 2010 .

[18]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[19]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[20]  Paul D. Cheney,et al.  The Impact of Group Size and Social Presence on Small-Group Communication , 2006 .

[21]  C. M. Chang,et al.  New organizational designs for promoting creativity: A case study of virtual teams with anonymity and structured interactions , 2011 .

[22]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Florian Kunze,et al.  The role of trust climate in virtual teams , 2012 .

[24]  Kerstin V. Siakas,et al.  The need for trust relationships to enable successful virtual team collaboration in software outsourcing , 2008 .

[25]  Surinder S. Kahai,et al.  Interaction Effect of Leadership and Communication Media on Feedback Positivity in Virtual Teams , 2012 .

[26]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  Virtual teaming: a strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[27]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  The impact of structural and contextual factors on trust formation in product development teams , 2010 .

[28]  Gholam Ali Shaykhian,et al.  Factors affecting virtual team performance in telecommunication support environment , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[29]  Yinglei Wang,et al.  Individual Virtual Competence and Its Influence on Work Outcomes , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Team Size, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[32]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[33]  Tammie D. Hertel,et al.  Team size and technology fit: participation, Awareness,and rapport in distributed teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[34]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  A social interaction approach to managing the "invisibles" of virtual teams , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[35]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations , 2014 .

[36]  Elizabeth Koh,et al.  Too Early, Too Bad: Uncovering and Understanding the Initial Participation Paradox in Technology-Mediated Learning Teams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[37]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[38]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..