Argumentation-Based Agent Deliberation

A novel organ-selection process uses a multiagent system called Carrel+ to let geographically dispersed transplant physicians deliberate over organ viability to increase the availability of organs for transplantation.

[1]  Ulises Cortés,et al.  Towards Formalising Agent Argumentation over the Viability of Human Organs for Transplantation , 2005, MICAI.

[2]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[3]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Francisco Caballero,et al.  Extended criteria for organ acceptance. Strategies for achieving organ safety and for increasing organ pool , 2003, Clinical transplantation.

[5]  Antonio Moreno,et al.  Management of Hospital Teams for Organ Transplants Using Multi-agent Systems , 2001, AIME.

[6]  D. Walton.  Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[7]  Miquel Sànchez-Marrè,et al.  CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision Making , 2006, COMMA.

[8]  Francisco Caballero,et al.  Successful Liver and Kidney Transplantation From Cadaveric Donors With Left‐Sided Bacterial Endocarditis , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[9]  Ulises Cortés,et al.  Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Heterogeneous Agents to Argue over the Viability of a Human Organ for Transplantation , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Argumentation for Consumers of Healthcare.