Macular SD-OCT Outcome Measures: Comparison of Local Structure-Function Relationships and Dynamic Range

Purpose We tested the hypothesis that the macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness demonstrates a stronger structure-function (SF) relationship and extends the useful range of macular measurements compared with combined macular inner layer or full thickness. Methods Ninety-eight glaucomatous eyes and eight normal eyes with macular spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) volume scans and 10-2 visual fields were enrolled. Inner plexiform layer (IPL), GCL, macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell complex (GCC), and full thickness (FT) measurements were calculated for 8 × 8 arrays of 3° superpixels. Main outcome measures were local structure-function relationships between macular superpixels and corresponding sensitivities on 10-2 fields after adjusting for ganglion cell displacement, dynamic range of measurements, and the change point (total deviation value where macular parameters reached measurement floor). Results Median (interquartile range [IQR]) mean deviation was −7.2 (−11.6 to −3.2) dB in glaucoma eyes. Strength of SF relationships was highest for GCIPL, GCL, GCC, and IPL (ρ = 0.635, 0.627, 0.621, and 0.577, respectively; P ≤ 0.046 for comparisons against GCIPL). Highest SF correlations coincided with the peak of GCL thickness, where the dynamic range was widest for FT (81.1 μm), followed by GCC (65.7 μm), GCIPL (54.9 μm), GCL (35.2 μm), mRNFL (27.5 μm), and IPL (20.9 μm). Change points were similar for all macular parameters (−7.8 to −8.9 dB). Conclusions GCIPL, GCL, and GCC demonstrated comparable SF relationships while FT, GCC, and GCIPL had the widest dynamic range. Measurement of GCL did not extend the range of useful structural measurements. Measuring GCL does not provide any advantage for detection of progression with current SD-OCT technology.

[1]  H. Rao,et al.  Comparing the Structure-Function Relationship at the Macula With Standard Automated Perimetry and Microperimetry. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  B. Yoo,et al.  Long-Term Reproducibility of Macular Ganglion Cell Analysis in Clinically Stable Glaucoma Patients. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Jean-Claude Mwanza,et al.  Residual and Dynamic Range of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma: Comparison of Three OCT Platforms. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  H. Yamada,et al.  Comparison of Longitudinal Changes in Functional and Structural Measures for Evaluating Progression of Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  W. Feuer,et al.  Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: automated detection and thickness reproducibility with spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Gerald McGwin,et al.  Human chorioretinal layer thicknesses measured in macula-wide, high-resolution histologic sections. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Youngrok Lee,et al.  Progression detection capability of macular thickness in advanced glaucomatous eyes. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[8]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[9]  M. Wagner,et al.  Repeatability of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and inner retinal thickness among two spectral domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Navid Amini,et al.  Local Variability of Macular Thickness Measurements With SD-OCT and Influencing Factors , 2016, Translational vision science & technology.

[11]  C. Leung Diagnosing glaucoma progression with optical coherence tomography. , 2014, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[12]  Michael Wall,et al.  Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[14]  N. Drasdo,et al.  The length of Henle fibers in the human retina and a model of ganglion receptive field density in the visual field , 2007, Vision Research.

[15]  Naoyuki Maeda,et al.  Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  D. Hood,et al.  Evaluation of a Method for Estimating Retinal Ganglion Cell Counts Using Visual Fields and Optical Coherence Tomography. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  Structure-function relationship of the macular visual field sensitivity and the ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucoma. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Profile and predictors of normal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  H. Kim,et al.  Detection of glaucomatous progression by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[21]  G. Holló,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness measurement with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Gadi Wollstein,et al.  OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[23]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Relationships of retinal structure and humphrey 24-2 visual field thresholds in patients with glaucoma. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  Jung Hwa Na,et al.  Usefulness of macular thickness derived from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in the detection of glaucoma progression. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  C. Mayama,et al.  Focal relationship between structure and function within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  A. Rao,et al.  Macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography for detection of early glaucoma and comparison to retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  D. Hood,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in regions of severe visual field sensitivity loss in patients with glaucoma , 2012, Eye.