Regional scale effects of the aerosol cloud interaction simulated with an online coupled comprehensive chemistry model

Abstract. We have extended the coupled mesoscale atmosphere and chemistry model COSMO-ART to account for the transformation of aerosol particles into cloud condensation nuclei and to quantify their interaction with warm cloud microphysics on the regional scale. The new model system aims to fill the gap between cloud resolving models and global scale models. It represents the very complex microscale aerosol and cloud physics as detailed as possible, whereas the continental domain size and efficient codes will allow for both studying weather and regional climate. The model system is applied in a first extended case study for Europe for a cloudy five day period in August 2005. The model results show that the mean cloud droplet number concentration of clouds is correlated with the structure of the terrain, and we present a terrain slope parameter TS to classify this dependency. We propose to use this relationship to parameterize the probability density function, PDF, of subgrid-scale cloud updraft velocity in the activation parameterizations of climate models. The simulations show that the presence of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and clouds are closely related spatially. We find high aerosol and CCN number concentrations in the vicinity of clouds at high altitudes. The nucleation of secondary particles is enhanced above the clouds. This is caused by an efficient formation of gaseous aerosol precursors above the cloud due to more available radiation, transport of gases in clean air above the cloud, and humid conditions. Therefore the treatment of complex photochemistry is crucial in atmospheric models to simulate the distribution of CCN. The mean cloud droplet number concentration and droplet diameter showed a close link to the change in the aerosol. To quantify the net impact of an aerosol change on the precipitation we calculated the precipitation susceptibility β for the whole model domain over a period of two days with an hourly resolution. The distribution function of β is slightly skewed to positive values and has a mean of 0.23. Clouds with a liquid water path LWP of approximately 0.85 kg m−2 are on average most susceptible to aerosol changes in our simulations with an absolute value of β of 1. The average β for LWP between 0.5 kg m−2 and 1 kg m−2 is approximately 0.4.

[1]  H. Köhler.  The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets , 1936 .

[2]  C. H. B. Priestley,et al.  The physics of rainclouds , 1955 .

[3]  S. Twomey,et al.  The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration , 1959 .

[4]  Gottfried Hänel,et al.  The Properties of Atmospheric Aerosol Particles as Functions of the Relative Humidity at Thermodynamic Equilibrium with the Surrounding Moist Air , 1976 .

[5]  M. Tiedtke.  A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .

[6]  L. Radke,et al.  Particle production associated with marine clouds , 1990 .

[7]  L. Radke,et al.  Humidity and Particle Fields Around Some Small Cumulus Clouds. , 1991 .

[8]  A. Wexler,et al.  Post-fog nucleation of H2SO4H2O particles in smog , 1994 .

[9]  L. Ruby Leung,et al.  Prediction of cloud droplet number in a general , 1997 .

[10]  A. Flossmann.  Interaction of Aerosol Particles and Clouds , 1998 .

[11]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Erratum: ``Prediction of the number of cloud droplets in the ECHAM GCM'' , 1999 .

[12]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .

[13]  K. D. Beheng,et al.  A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection , 2001 .

[14]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Bursts of Aitken mode and ultrafine particles observed at the top of continental boundary layer clouds , 2001 .

[15]  A. Weinheimer,et al.  Deep convection as a source of new particles in the midlatitude upper troposphere , 2002 .

[16]  S. Solberg,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2002 .

[17]  B. Vogel,et al.  Modeling aerosols on the mesoscale‐γ: Treatment of soot aerosol and its radiative effects , 2003 .

[18]  J. Steppeler,et al.  Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM , 2003 .

[19]  Athanasios Nenes,et al.  Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models , 2005 .

[20]  Alexander Khain,et al.  A comparison of spectral bin and two-moment bulk mixed-phase cloud microphysics , 2006 .

[21]  K. D. Beheng,et al.  A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 2: Maritime vs. continental deep convective storms , 2006 .

[22]  K. D. Beheng,et al.  A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description , 2006 .

[23]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Predicting cloud droplet number concentration in community atmosphere model (CAM)-Oslo , 2006 .

[24]  Klimawirksamkeit von Rußpartikeln in Baden-Württemberg , 2006 .

[25]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[26]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2007 .

[27]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[28]  P. V. Velthoven,et al.  Influence of clouds on aerosol particle number concentrations in the upper troposphere , 2009 .

[29]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Aerosol Influence on Mixed-Phase Clouds in CAM-Oslo , 2008 .

[30]  A. Pokrovsky,et al.  Factors Determining the Impact of Aerosols on Surface Precipitation from Clouds: An Attempt at Classification , 2008 .

[31]  H. Leighton,et al.  Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in a Mesoscale Model. Part I: Sensitivity to Activation and Collision–Coalescence , 2008 .

[32]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation? , 2008, Science.

[33]  Aerosol Impacts on the Diurnal Cycle of Marine Stratocumulus , 2008 .

[34]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Online-coupled meteorology and chemistry models: history, current status, and outlook , 2008 .

[35]  M. Chipperfield,et al.  The relationship between aerosol and cloud drop number concentrations in a global aerosol microphysics model , 2009 .

[36]  P. Chuang,et al.  Can aerosol decrease cloud lifetime? , 2009 .

[37]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data , 2009 .

[38]  M. Lebsock,et al.  On the precipitation susceptibility of clouds to aerosol perturbations , 2009 .

[39]  B. Stevens,et al.  Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system , 2009, Nature.

[40]  V. Masson,et al.  How important is the vertical structure for the representation of aerosol impacts on the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus , 2008 .

[41]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Sensitivity Studies of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Mixed-Phase Orographic Precipitation , 2009 .

[42]  W. Cotton,et al.  Aerosol Pollution Impact on Precipitation , 2009 .

[43]  H. Wernli,et al.  Aerosol- and updraft-limited regimes of cloud droplet formation: influence of particle number, size and hygroscopicity on the activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) , 2009 .

[44]  A. Khain.  Notes on state-of-the-art investigations of aerosol effects on precipitation: a critical review , 2009 .

[45]  G. Mann,et al.  Impact of nucleation on global CCN , 2009 .

[46]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  The effects of aerosols on intense convective precipitation in the northeastern United States , 2009 .

[47]  T. Stanelle,et al.  The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART – Radiative impact of aerosol on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale , 2009 .

[48]  Guohui Li,et al.  Impacts of aerosols on the development and precipitation of a mesoscale squall line , 2009 .

[49]  W. Cotton,et al.  Aerosol pollution impact on precipitation : a scientific review , 2009 .

[50]  M. Lebsock,et al.  Deconstructing the precipitation susceptibility construct: Improving methodology for aerosol-cloud precipitation studies , 2010 .

[51]  Wei‐Chyung Wang,et al.  Simulation of the effects of increasing cloud condensation nuclei on mixed-phase clouds and precipitation of a front system , 2010 .