Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.

PURPOSE To evaluate the additional value of shear-wave elastography (SWE) to B-mode ultrasonography (US) and to determine an appropriate guideline for the combined assessment of screening US-detected breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted with institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained. From March 2010 to February 2012, B-mode US and SWE were performed in 159 US-detected breast masses before biopsy. For each lesion, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category on B-mode US images and the maximum stiffness color and elasticity values on SWE images were assessed. A guideline for adding SWE data to B-mode US was developed with the retrospective cohort to improve diagnostic performance in sensitivity and specificity and was validated in a distinct prospective cohort of 207 women prior to biopsy. RESULTS Twenty-one of 159 masses in the development cohort and 12 of 207 breast masses in the validation cohort were malignant. In the development cohort, when BI-RADS category 4a masses showing a dark blue color or a maximum elasticity value of 30 kPa or less on SWE images were downgraded to category 3, specificity increased from 9.4% (13 of 138) to 59.4% (82 of 138) and 57.2% (79 of 138) (P < .001), respectively, without loss in sensitivity (100% [21 of 21]). In the validation cohort, specificity increased from 17.4% (34 of 195) to 62.1% (121 of 195) and 53.3% (104 of 195) (P < .001) respectively, without loss in sensitivity (91.7% [11 of 12]). CONCLUSION The addition of SWE to B-mode US improved diagnostic performance with increased specificity for screening US-detected breast masses. BI-RADS category 4a masses detected at US screening that showed a dark blue color or a maximum elasticity value of 30 kPa or less on SWE images can be safely followed up instead of performing biopsy.

[1]  W. Berg.  Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[2]  D. Noh,et al.  Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  Kartini Rahmat,et al.  Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[5]  Jung Hyun Yoon,et al.  Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results? , 2013, European Radiology.

[6]  Eun-Kyung Kim,et al.  Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: A retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[7]  C. Merritt.  Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[8]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[9]  Markus Hahn,et al.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[10]  L. Philpotts,et al.  Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. , 2012, Radiology.

[11]  P. Porter,et al.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  Kim Thomson,et al.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  A. Thompson,et al.  Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. , 2012, Radiology.

[14]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. , 2014, Radiology.

[15]  Eun Ju Son,et al.  Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[16]  W. Svensson,et al.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. , 2012, Radiology.

[17]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer , 2013, European Radiology.

[18]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up. , 2013, Radiology.

[20]  M. Fink,et al.  Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[21]  David O. Cosgrove,et al.  Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible , 2011, European Radiology.

[22]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Sonoelastography for 1786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy , 2012, European Radiology.