Matrix Effects in Quantitative Analysis of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) of Rock Powders Doped with Cr, Mn, Ni, Zn, and Co

Obtaining quantitative chemical information using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is challenging due to the variability in the bulk composition of geological materials. Chemical matrix effects caused by this variability produce changes in the peak area that are not proportional to the changes in minor element concentration. Therefore the use of univariate calibrations to predict trace element concentrations in geological samples is plagued by a high degree of uncertainty. This work evaluated the accuracy of univariate minor element predictions as a function of the composition of the major element matrices of the samples and examined the factors that limit the prediction accuracy of univariate calibrations. Five different sample matrices were doped with 10–85 000 ppm Cr, Mn, Ni, Zn, and Co and then independently measured in 175 mixtures by X-ray fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, the latter at three different laser energies (1.9, 2.8, and 3.7 mJ). Univariate prediction models for minor element concentrations were created using varying combinations of dopants, matrices, normalization/no normalization, and energy density; the model accuracies were evaluated using root mean square prediction errors and leave-one-out cross-validation. The results showed the superiority of using normalization for predictions of minor elements when the predicted sample and those in the training set had matrices with similar SiO2 contents. Normalization also mitigates differences in spectra arising from laser/sample coupling effects and the use of different energy densities. Prediction of minor elements in matrices that are dissimilar to those in the training set can increase the uncertainty of prediction by an order of magnitude. Overall, the quality of a univariate calibration is primarily determined by the availability of a persistent, measurable peak with a favorable transition probability that has little to no interference from neighboring peaks in the spectra of both the unknown and those used to train it.

[1]  S. Clegg,et al.  Multivariate analysis of remote laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy spectra using partial least squares, principal component analysis, and related techniques , 2009 .

[2]  J. Anzano,et al.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for quantitative spectrochemical analysis of geological materials: effects of the matrix and simultaneous determination. , 2006, Analytica chimica acta.

[3]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  A study of machine learning regression methods for major elemental analysis of rocks using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2015 .

[4]  J. M. Rhodes Geochemistry of the 1984 Mauna Loa Eruption: Implications for magma storage and supply , 1988 .

[5]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Composition of basaltic lavas sampled by phase‐2 of the Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project: Geochemical stratigraphy and magma types , 2004 .

[6]  F. Hauff,et al.  Regional‐scale input of dispersed and discrete volcanic ash to the Izu‐Bonin and Mariana subduction zones , 2014 .

[7]  Roger C. Wiens,et al.  Trace element geochemistry (Li, Ba, Sr, and Rb) using Curiosity's ChemCam: Early results for Gale crater from Bradbury Landing Site to Rocknest , 2014 .

[8]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Fast and precise automatic baseline correction of one- and two-dimensional nmr spectra , 1991 .

[9]  D. Cremers,et al.  Matrix Effects in the Detection of Pb and Ba in Soils Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy , 1996 .

[10]  O. Forni,et al.  High manganese concentrations in rocks at Gale crater, Mars , 2014 .

[11]  B. Bousquet,et al.  Towards quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of soil samples ☆ , 2007 .

[12]  N. Bridges,et al.  The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests , 2012 .

[13]  K Norrish,et al.  An accurate X-ray spectrographic method for the analysis of a wide range of geological samples , 1969 .

[14]  Roger C. Wiens,et al.  Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy library for the Martian environment , 2011 .

[15]  Robert L. Tokar,et al.  In situ calibration using univariate analyses based on the onboard ChemCam targets: first prediction of Martian rock and soil compositions , 2014 .

[16]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Strategies for Mars remote Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy analysis of sulfur in geological samples , 2011 .

[17]  D. Rea,et al.  Resolving eolian, volcanogenic, and authigenic components in pelagic sediment from the Pacific Ocean , 2007 .

[18]  Robert L. Tokar,et al.  Pre-flight calibration and initial data processing for the ChemCam laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory rover , 2013 .

[19]  Jeffrey R. Johnson,et al.  Observation of > 5 wt % zinc at the Kimberley outcrop, Gale crater, Mars , 2016 .