Hypothetico-deductive confirmation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Popper. A Third Note on Degree of Corroboration or Confirmation , 1958 .
[2] David Lindley,et al. Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .
[3] W. Quine. Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism. , 1951 .
[4] The Tacking by Disjunction Paradox: Bayesianism Versus Hypothetico-Deductivism , 2006 .
[5] D J Frame,et al. Probabilistic climate forecasts and inductive problems , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[6] Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al. Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. , 2010, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[7] M. Subrahmanyam. Theory and Evidence , 2013 .
[8] Ken Gemes. Hypothetico-Deductivism: Incomplete But Not Hopeless , 2005 .
[9] L. Good,et al. THE PARADOX OF CONFIRMATION* , 1960, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[10] Ken Gemes. Schurz on hypothetico-deductivism , 1994 .
[11] G. Schurz. Relevant deduction and hypothetico-deductivism: A reply to gemes , 1994 .
[12] Ken Gemes,et al. Content & Watkins's account of natural axiomatizations , 2006 .
[13] Thomas R. Grimes. Truth, Content, and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method , 1990, Philosophy of Science.
[14] Ken Gemes,et al. A New Theory of Content II: Model Theory and Some Alternatives , 1997, J. Philos. Log..
[15] joe. morrison,et al. Just how controversial is evidential holism? , 2010, Synthese.
[16] Ken Gemes,et al. A new theory of content I: Basic content , 1994, J. Philos. Log..
[17] Deborah G. Mayo,et al. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge , 1996 .
[18] Willard Van OrmanQuine,et al. Two Dogmas of Empiricism 1 a , 2008 .
[19] Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem,et al. La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure , 1906 .
[20] Branden Fitelson,et al. Discussion: Re‐solving Irrelevant Conjunction with Probabilistic Independence* , 2004, Philosophy of Science.
[21] Ken Gemes. Hypothetico-Deductivism: The Current State of Play; the Criterion of Empirical Significance: Endgame , 1998 .
[22] Ken Gemes. Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories , 1993, Philosophy of Science.
[23] Gerhard Schurz,et al. Relevant deduction , 1991, Erkenntnis.
[24] K. Popper,et al. Logik der Forschung , 1935 .
[25] Hypothetico-Deductivism is Still Hopeless , 2004 .
[26] Carl G. Hempel,et al. A purely syntactical definition of confirmation , 1943, Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[27] Clark Glymour,et al. Hypothetico-Deductivism Is Hopeless , 1980, Philosophy of Science.
[28] Branden Fitelson. The Paradox of Confirmation1 , 2006 .
[29] Christopher Hitchcock,et al. Prediction Versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[30] Branden Fitelson,et al. How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens , 2010 .
[31] G. Schurz. Relevant Deduction. From Solving Paradoxes Towards a General Theory , 1991 .
[32] Rory A. Fisher,et al. Statistical methods and scientific inference. , 1957 .
[33] P. Horwich. Probability and Evidence , 1972 .
[34] Karl R. Popper,et al. Degree of Confirmation , 1954 .