Testing hypotheses and the advancement of science: recent attempts to falsify the equilibrium point hypothesis

Criticisms of the equilibrium point (EP) hypothesis have recently appeared that are based on misunderstandings of some of its central notions. Starting from such interpretations of the hypothesis, incorrect predictions are made and tested. When the incorrect predictions prove false, the hypothesis is claimed to be falsified. In particular, the hypothesis has been rejected based on the wrong assumptions that it conflicts with empirically defined joint stiffness values or that it is incompatible with violations of equifinality under certain velocity-dependent perturbations. Typically, such attempts use notions describing the control of movements of artificial systems in place of physiologically relevant ones. While appreciating constructive criticisms of the EP hypothesis, we feel that incorrect interpretations have to be clarified by reiterating what the EP hypothesis does and does not predict. We conclude that the recent claims of falsifying the EP hypothesis and the calls for its replacement by EMG-force control hypothesis are unsubstantiated. The EP hypothesis goes far beyond the EMG-force control view. In particular, the former offers a resolution for the famous posture-movement paradox while the latter fails to resolve it.

[1]  C. Sherrington.  Flexion‐reflex of the limb, crossed extension‐reflex, and reflex stepping and standing , 1910, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  N. A. Bemstein.  The problem of interrelation between coordination and localization , 1935 .

[3]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Introduction to Matrix Analysis , 1972 .

[4]  P. Glansdorff,et al.  Thermodynamic theory of structure, stability and fluctuations , 1971 .

[5]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[6]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Human muscle spindle discharge during isometric voluntary contractions. Amplitude relations between spindle frequency and torque. , 1974, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[7]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Terminal Accuracy of Unexpectedly Loaded Rapid Movements , 1980 .

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Terminal accuracy of unexpectedly loaded rapid movements: evidence for a mass-spring mechanism in programming. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  C. Marsden,et al.  Automatic and ‘voluntary’ responses compensating for disturbances of human thumb movements , 1982, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Hollerbach.  Computers, brains and the control of movement , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  A. G. Fel'dman,et al.  Interaction of afferent and efferent signals underlying joint position sense: empirical and theoretical approaches. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  S. Cannon,et al.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A. G. Feldman.  Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control , 1986 .

[14]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback. , 1987, Human neurobiology.

[15]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The Origin of Electromyograms - Explanations Based on the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis , 1990 .

[16]  G. L. Gottlieb,et al.  Reconstruction of shifting elbow joint compliant characteristics during fast and slow movements , 1991, Neuroscience.

[17]  N. Hogan,et al.  Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[18]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Control of Trajectory Modifications in Target-Directed Reaching. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  A. G. Feldman.  The coactivation command for antagonist muscles involving Ib interneurons in mammalian motor control systems: an electrophysiologically testable model , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  M. Latash.  Control of human movement , 1993 .

[21]  M. Latash,et al.  Joint stiffness: Myth or reality? , 1993 .

[22]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  G. Somjen,et al.  Spreading depression of Leão: 50 years since a seminal discovery. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  C. Gielen,et al.  Reciprocal and coactivation commands are not sufficient to describe muscle activation patterns , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Control parameters, equilibria, and coordination dynamics , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement , 1996, Science.

[31]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Spatial zones for muscle coactivation and the control of postural stability , 1997, Brain Research.

[32]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling , 1997, Neuroscience.

[33]  Timothy Ferris,et al.  The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report , 1997 .

[34]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Recent Tests of the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) , 1998 .

[36]  M. Arbib,et al.  Role of the cerebellum in reaching movements in humans. I. Distributed inverse dynamics control , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  D J Ostry,et al.  Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  V. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Instant equilibrium point and its migration in standing tasks: rambling and trembling components of the stabilogram. , 1999, Motor control.

[39]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Changes in movement kinematics during single-joint movements against expectedly and unexpectedly changed inertial loads , 1999 .

[40]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  D J Ostry,et al.  Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  M. Levin,et al.  Deficits in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: implications for normal motor control , 2000, Brain Research.

[43]  W. Rymer,et al.  End points of planar reaching movements are disrupted by small force pulses: an evaluation of the hypothesis of equifinality. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  M. Levin,et al.  Regulation of stretch reflex threshold in elbow flexors in children with cerebral palsy: a new measure of spasticity , 2000, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[45]  V M Zatsiorsky,et al.  Rambling and trembling in quiet standing. , 2000, Motor control.

[46]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Multi-muscle control of head movements in monkeys: the referent configuration hypothesis , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[47]  Strategies used to stabilize the elbow joint challenged by inverted pendulum loading. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Wachholder and Altenburger 1927: Foundational Experiments for Current Hypotheses on Equilibrium-PointControl in Voluntary Movements , 2002 .

[50]  Philippe Micheau,et al.  Evaluation of the lambda model for human postural control during ankle strategy , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[51]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Referent configuration of the body: a global factor in the control of multiple skeletal muscles , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  A Kemeny,et al.  Perception and reproduction of force direction in the horizontal plane. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  David J. Ostry,et al.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  M. Günther,et al.  Synthesis of two-dimensional human walking: a test of the λ-model , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[55]  F. Popescu,et al.  Implications of low mechanical impedance in upper limb reaching motion. , 2003, Motor control.

[56]  W. Zev Rymer,et al.  Elbow impedance during goal-directed movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Michael Günther,et al.  Synthesis of two-dimensional human walking: a test of the lambda-model , 2003, Biol. Cybern..

[58]  M. Hinder,et al.  The Case for an Internal Dynamics Model versus Equilibrium Point Control in Human Movement , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  T. Milner,et al.  Adaptive control of stiffness to stabilize hand position with large loads , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Stability properties of human reaching movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[62]  Anatol G. Feldman,et al.  Guiding Movements without Redundancy Problems , 2004 .

[63]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Arm trajectory formation in monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  M. Latash.  Control of fast elbow movement: a study of electromyographic patterns during movements against unexpectedly decreased inertial load , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.