Design teams � a participatory path to socially transformative innovation?

This study investigates how a design team with researchers and participants from different parts and levels of an organisation may function as a participatory method for socially transformative innovation. The experiences gained by a design team in one of Sweden’s major forestry companies are examined through a participatory, single case study approach, in which researchers and employees jointly developed new insights and ideas. The results reveal that the design team functioned well in terms of channelling the participants’ expertise and experiences into innovative ideas, but less well as regards aligning the latter with the company’s regular management procedures, thus reducing the function of the design team to an abstract symbol of organisational ‘modernity’, rather than an effective instrument for social transformation.

[1]  David Hakken Work‐Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts , 1989 .

[2]  Rianne Valkenburg Shared understanding as a condition for team design , 1998 .

[3]  Ac Rianne Valkenburg,et al.  The reflective practice of design teams , 1998 .

[4]  D. Blahna,et al.  Involvement of Women and Minorities in the Urban Forestry Profession , 2002, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[5]  M. Haugen,et al.  Text, Body, and Tools , 2005 .

[6]  G. Lidestav,et al.  Gender and forestry: A critical discourse analysis of forestry professions in Sweden , 2007 .

[7]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[8]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[9]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[10]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects , 2008 .

[11]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Participatory innovation: a research agenda , 2008, PDC.

[12]  Michael Smyth,et al.  Towards a new disciplinary framework for contemporary creative design practice , 2009 .

[13]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process , 2011 .

[14]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Dealing with dilemmas: participatory approaches in design for social innovation , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Vink,et al.  Expectation changes and team characteristics in a participatory design process. , 2012, Work.

[16]  O. Iversen,et al.  Values-led participatory design , 2012 .

[17]  Bo Johansson,et al.  Mining and Sustainable Development : Gender, Diversity and Work Conditions in Mining , 2014 .

[18]  M. Lindberg,et al.  Organizational innovation for gender equality in forestry and mining , 2016 .

[19]  H. Hansen,et al.  Action research for democracy : new ideas and perspectives from Scandinavia , 2016 .

[20]  R. Kemp,et al.  Towards a TSI theory: a relational framework and 12 propositions , 2017 .

[21]  M. Fred Projectification: The Trojan horse of local government , 2018 .