Satisfaction in societies with opinion leaders and mediators: properties and an axiomatization

In this paper we propose the opinion leader-follower through mediators systems — OLFM systems— a multiple-action collective choice model for societies. In those societies three kind of actors are considered: opinion leaders that can exert certain influence over the decision of other actors, followers that can be convinced to modify their original decisions, and independent actors that neither are influenced nor can influence; mediators are actors that both are influenced and influence other actors. This is a generalization of the opinion leader-follower systems —OLF systems— proposed by (9). The satisfaction score is defined on the set of actors. For each actor it measures the number of society initial decisions in which the final collective decision coincides with the one that the actor initially selected. We generalize in OLFM systems some properties that the satisfaction score meets for OLF systems. By using these properties, we provide an axiomatization of the satisfaction score for the case in which followers maintain their own initial decisions unless all their opinion leaders share an opposite inclination. This new axiomatization generalizes the one given by (10) for OLF systems under the same restrictions.

[1]  William S. Zwicker,et al.  Simple games - desirability relations, trading, pseudoweightings , 1999 .

[2]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Graphs and Cooperation in Games , 1977, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Verling C. Troldahl A FIELD TEST OF A MODIFIED “TWO-STEP FLOW OF COMMUNICATION” MODEL , 1966 .

[4]  Edith Elkind,et al.  Computing the nucleolus of weighted voting games , 2008, SODA.

[5]  Annick Laruelle,et al.  Success Versus Decisiveness , 2006 .

[6]  Josep Freixas,et al.  Banzhaf Measures for Games with Several Levels of Approval in the Input and Output , 2005, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Brad Verhulst,et al.  Conformity in Groups: The effects of groups on expressed attitudes , 2009 .

[8]  René van den Brink,et al.  Axiomatizations of Banzhaf permission values for games with a permission structure , 2010, Int. J. Game Theory.

[9]  D. Rae,et al.  Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[10]  Edward M. Bolger,et al.  Characterizations of two power indices for voting games with r alternatives , 2002, Soc. Choice Welf..

[11]  E. Leher An axiomatization of the Banzhaf value , 1988 .

[12]  Pradeep Dubey,et al.  Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index , 1979, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  René van den Brink,et al.  Measuring power and satisfaction in societies with opinion leaders: an axiomatization , 2011, Social Choice and Welfare.

[14]  L. Penrose The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting , 1946 .

[15]  Jens Woelke,et al.  Personal Influence. The Part Played by the People in the Flow of Mass Communication , 2016 .

[16]  Josep Freixas,et al.  The Shapley-Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Hans Haller,et al.  Collusion properties of values , 1994 .

[18]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[19]  Maria J. Serna,et al.  Social Influence as a Voting System: a Complexity Analysis of Parameters and Properties , 2012, ArXiv.

[20]  Agnieszka Rusinowska,et al.  Measuring Power and Satisfaction in Societies with Opinion Leaders: Dictator and Opinion Leaders , 2009 .

[21]  Edward M. Bolger,et al.  A consistent value for games with n players and r alternatives , 2000, Int. J. Game Theory.

[22]  Josep Freixas,et al.  Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval , 2003, Soc. Choice Welf..

[23]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory , 2011, KES-AMSTA.

[24]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory , 2011, KES-AMSTA.

[25]  R. Brink An axiomatization of the disjunctive permission value for games with a permission structure , 1997 .

[26]  Robin Wilson,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2013 .

[27]  Maria J. Serna,et al.  Star-shaped mediation in influence games , 2013, CTW.

[28]  Forming Coalitions and Measuring Voting Power , 1982 .

[29]  Agnieszka Rusinowska,et al.  Measuring Power and Satisfaction in Societies with Opinion Leaders: An Axiomatization , 2011 .

[30]  Edward M. Bolger Power indices for multicandidate voting games , 1986 .

[31]  Steuart Henderson Britt,et al.  Review of The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. , 1945 .