Energy saving in the operation of submerged MBRs by the insertion of baffles and the introduction of granular materials

Abstract A membrane bioreactor (MBR) is not a mainstream wastewater treatment technology, mainly because the energy consumption in an MBR operation is high. This study investigated the mitigation of membrane fouling and the reduction in aeration through the introduction of granules into a pilot-scale baffled membrane bioreactor (BMBR) used to treat municipal wastewater. With granular materials, the BMBR could be stably operated, even when the filterability of the mixed liquor suspensions was considerably low due to low temperatures. The aeration rate could be reduced by more than 50% with the help of granules. However, it was found that the introduction of granules damaged parts of the membrane surface. The damage might be avoided by adjusting the contact intensity of the granules and the membrane surface.

[1]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Membrane Bioreactors in Waste Water Treatment – Status and Trends , 2010 .

[2]  T. Asano Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies, and Applications , 2007 .

[3]  Jianyu Sun,et al.  Seasonal characteristics of supernatant organics and its effect on membrane fouling in a full-scale membrane bioreactor , 2014 .

[4]  Paolo Pavan,et al.  Operation and Maintenance of full-scale Municipal Membrane Biological Reactors: a detailed overview on a case study , 2007 .

[5]  Simon Judd,et al.  The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment , 2006 .

[6]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[7]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  S. Vigneswaran,et al.  Influence of hydraulic retention time on the nature of foulant organics in a high rate membrane bioreactor , 2012 .

[9]  F. Meng,et al.  Comparison of membrane fouling during short-term filtration of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge. , 2007, Journal of environmental sciences.

[10]  Chris Thoeye,et al.  Energy audit of a full scale MBR system , 2010 .

[11]  Le Jin,et al.  Fouling control mechanism by suspended biofilm carriers addition in submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors , 2013 .

[12]  Xia Huang,et al.  Mechanism of membrane fouling control by suspended carriers in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2008 .

[13]  G Amy,et al.  Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter. , 2001, Water research.

[14]  Samer Adham,et al.  Are membrane bioreactors ready for widespread application? , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[16]  Thomas Melin,et al.  Long-term monitoring of a full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor—Characterisation of foulants and operational performance , 2008 .

[17]  A. Drews,et al.  Impact of ambient conditions on SMP elimination and rejection in MBRs. , 2007, Water research.

[18]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Baffled membrane bioreactor (BMBR) for efficient nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. , 2008, Water research.

[19]  P Cornel,et al.  Effect of mechanical cleaning with granular material on the permeability of submerged membranes in the MBR process. , 2010, Water research.

[20]  Daniel Prats,et al.  Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR , 2010 .

[21]  Hardy Temmink,et al.  Effect of temperature shocks on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. , 2011, Water research.

[22]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.