An alternative view of the deconvolution problem

The deconvolution kernel density estimator is a popular technique for solving the deconvolution problem, where the goal is to estimate a density from a sample of contaminated observations. Although this estimator is optimal, it suffers from two major drawbacks: it converges at very slow rates (inherent to the deconvolution problem) and can only be calculated when the density of the errors is completely known. These properties, however, follow from a classical asymptotic view of the problem which lets the sample size n ! 1 but where the error variance � 2 is supposed to be fixed. We argue that, in many situations, a more appropriate way to derive asymptotic properties for the deconvolution problem is to consider that both � 2 ! 0 and n ! 1. In this context, not only do the rates of convergence of the deconvolution kernel density estimator improve considerably, but it is also possible to consistently estimate the target density with only little knowledge of the error density. In particular, the deconvolution kernel density estimator becomes robust against error misspecification and a low-order approximation developed in the literature becomes consistent. We propose a data-driven procedure for the low- order method and investigate the numerical performance of the various estimators on simulated and real data examples.

[1]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  Nonparametric methods for solving the Berkson errors‐in‐variables problem , 2006 .

[2]  Jianqing Fan On the Optimal Rates of Convergence for Nonparametric Deconvolution Problems , 1991 .

[3]  P. Hall,et al.  Estimating a Changepoint, Boundary, or Frontier in the Presence of Observation Error , 2002 .

[4]  J. Doob Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[5]  E. Masry Strong consistency and rates for deconvolution of multivariate densities of stationary processes , 1993 .

[6]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Low order approximations in deconvolution and regression with errors in variables , 2004 .

[7]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  Discrete-transform approach to deconvolution problems , 2005 .

[8]  Alexander Meister,et al.  DENSITY ESTIMATION WITH NORMAL MEASUREMENT ERROR WITH UNKNOWN VARIANCE , 2006 .

[9]  P. Hall,et al.  Optimal Rates of Convergence for Deconvolving a Density , 1988 .

[10]  Alexander Meister,et al.  On the effect of misspecifying the error density in a deconvolution problem , 2004 .

[11]  Irène Gijbels,et al.  Practical bandwidth selection in deconvolution kernel density estimation , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[12]  Graham Dunn,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors: Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies , 2004 .

[13]  R. Carroll,et al.  Deconvolving kernel density estimators , 1987 .

[14]  R. Carter Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Bias and Reliability in the Comparison of Several Measuring Methods , 1981 .

[15]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[16]  M. Wand,et al.  EXACT MEAN INTEGRATED SQUARED ERROR , 1992 .

[17]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[18]  Aurore Delaigle,et al.  Nonparametric density estimation from data with a mixture of Berkson and classical errors , 2007 .

[19]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Global Behavior of Deconvolution Kernel Estimates , 1989 .

[20]  D. Ruppert,et al.  Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models , 1995 .

[21]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Deconvolution with supersmooth distributions , 1992 .

[22]  Estimation of integrated squared density derivatives from a contaminated sample , 2002 .