Impact of computer augmented communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities

This study investigated the impact of Bliss-based computer augmented communication (CAC) on the daily communi- cation and activities of six severely disabled speech-impaired children and youngsters - from the point of view of the children and youngsters, and their discussion partners and therapists. The study investigated CAC during the first year of its use in real life settings. The implementation process of CAC was highly individual and context dependent. During the study all of the speech-impaired participants learned to operate their CAC devices. Their initial enthusiasm began to decline three to six months after the participants received their devices. At the end of the study year, the CAC devices were hardly used for face-to-face communication, but they were used mainly for educational purposes, written communication, or play and leisure. The main reasons for not using the CAC devices were their poor usability, slow operation speeds and insufficient vocabularies, as well as a lack of related services. The speech-impaired children considered the CAC devices important for them and primarily helpful for schoolwork and play.

[1]  S. Kvale Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[2]  J Brodin Implementation of new technology for persons with mental retardation and the importance of staff education , 1998, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  W. Yule,et al.  Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral-palsied children--a longitudinal study. III. Teaching practices and exposure to sign and symbol use in schools and homes. , 1991, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[4]  John Todman,et al.  The Use of Stored Text in Computer-Aided Conversation: , 1999 .

[5]  W. Yule,et al.  Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral-palsied children--a longitudinal study. II. Pragmatic features of sign and symbol use. , 1991, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[6]  Ivana Marková,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: Demographic survey , 1995 .

[7]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[8]  Janice Light,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary c , 1985 .

[9]  W. Yule,et al.  Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral palsied children--a longitudinal study. I. The acquisition of signs and symbols, and syntactic aspects of their use over time. , 1990, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[10]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[11]  Kathryn D R Drager,et al.  Improving the Design of Augmentative and Alternative Technologies for Young Children , 2002, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[12]  D. Polkinghorne Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis , 1995 .

[13]  Ursula Hass Assessment of assistive technology : outcomes, costs and quality , 1996 .

[14]  E Moodie,et al.  AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[15]  Janice Light,et al.  Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems , 1989 .

[16]  I. Marková,et al.  Interaction between impaired and unimpaired speakers: inter-subjectivity and the interplay of culturally shared and situation specific knowledge. , 1999, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  S. Merriam Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education , 1998 .

[18]  Julia King Preliminary Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists Providing AAC Services in Health Care Settings in Nebraska , 1998 .

[19]  P. Parnes,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I—discourse patterns , 1985 .

[20]  Janice Light,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III—modes of communication , 1985 .

[21]  Donna M Cowan,et al.  The User's Perspective on the Provision of Electronic Assistive Technology: Equipped for Life? , 1999 .