Use of Google Scholar in corpus-driven EAP research

This primarily methodological article makes a proposition for linguistic exploration of textual resources available through the Google Scholar search engine. These resources (Google Scholar virtual corpus) are significantly larger than any existing corpus of academic writing. Google Scholar, however, was not designed for linguistic searches and special attention therefore needs to be paid to maximising its effectiveness in corpus linguistics research. The article discusses the search capacity of Google Scholar and compares the Google Scholar virtual corpus with the largest traditional corpus of written academic English, COCA – academic. Finally, the article offers a case study on the as-author-reporting verb structure (and its modifications). The study demonstrates that Google Scholar can be employed effectively in EAP research offering us new insights into reporting practices in two disciplines, Applied Linguistics and Physics, which were chosen for comparison. The benefits of using Google Scholar virtual corpus are the following: 1) wide representativeness of written academic language, 2) possibility of capturing subtle variation in academic patterns, and 3) possibility of comparing linguistic patterns across different academic fields.

[1]  Mark Davies,et al.  The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English , 2010, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[2]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Evolution of the Internet and its cores , 2008 .

[3]  Tai Gyu Kim,et al.  When Things Don't Add Up , 2005, Psychological science.

[4]  Ramesh Krishnamurthy,et al.  Issues in creating a corpus for EAP pedagogy and research , 2007 .

[5]  Maggie Charles,et al.  The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses , 2006 .

[6]  J. Swales Research Genres: Explorations and Applications , 2004 .

[7]  William H. Fletcher Concordancing the web: promise and problems, tools and techniques , 2007 .

[8]  Scott L. Howell,et al.  Google Scholar and the Continuing Education Literature , 2009 .

[9]  G. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. , 1991 .

[10]  Mohsen Ghadessy,et al.  Small corpus studies and ELT : theory and practice , 2001 .

[11]  Lynne Flowerdew,et al.  The argument for using English specialised corpora to understand academic and professional language. , 2004 .

[12]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Exploring the academic invisible web , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[13]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[14]  Sally Rice,et al.  English sit, stand, and lie in small and large corpora , 2001 .

[15]  Thomas Hawes,et al.  Reporting verbs in medical journal articles , 1994 .

[16]  Robert Lew,et al.  The Web as corpus versus traditional corpora: Their relative utility for linguists and language learners , 2009 .

[17]  Tense Choices in Citations. , 1997 .

[18]  Henry Widdowson,et al.  Text, Context, Pretext : Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis , 2004 .

[19]  Diane Pecorari,et al.  Academic Writing and Plagiarism: A Linguistic Analysis , 2008 .

[20]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[21]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Google Scholar revisited , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[22]  Paul Thompson,et al.  LOOKING AT CITATIONS: USING CORPORA IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES , 2001 .

[23]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Self-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Activity and evaluation: reporting practices in academic writing , 2002 .

[25]  D. Janzing,et al.  A single-shot measurement of the energy of product states in a translation invariant spin chain can replace any quantum computation , 2007, 0710.1615.

[26]  Philipp Mayr,et al.  An exploratory study of Google Scholar , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[27]  Philip Shaw Reasons for the Correlation of Voice, Tense, and Sentence Function in Reporting Verbs. , 1992 .

[28]  Mark Davies The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) , 2012 .

[29]  Lynne Flowerdew Corpus-based Analyses in EAP , 2014 .

[30]  Mark Davies The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990―2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights , 2009 .

[31]  Randi Reppen,et al.  Using Corpora in the Language Classroom , 2010 .

[32]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. , 1999 .

[33]  Stefan Evert,et al.  Using web data for linguistic purposes , 2007 .

[34]  Chris Neuhaus,et al.  The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study , 2006 .

[35]  Jared L. Howland,et al.  How Scholarly Is Google Scholar? A Comparison to Library Databases , 2009 .

[36]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Representativeness in corpus design , 1993 .

[37]  Vaclav Brezina Google Scholar as a linguistic tool:new possibilities in EAP , 2012 .

[38]  Maggie-Jo St. John,et al.  Developments in ESP : a multi-disciplinary approach , 1998 .

[39]  Lynn Quinn,et al.  Teaching Referencing as an Introduction to Epistemological Empowerment , 2000 .

[40]  Ronald Carter,et al.  Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse , 2004 .

[41]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on the Web as Corpus , 2003, CL.

[42]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses , 2005 .