Evidence from a rare case study for Hebbian-like changes in structural connectivity induced by long-term deep brain stimulation

It is unclear whether Hebbian-like learning occurs at the level of long-range white matter connections in humans, i.e., where measurable changes in structural connectivity (SC) are correlated with changes in functional connectivity. However, the behavioral changes observed after deep brain stimulation (DBS) suggest the existence of such Hebbian-like mechanisms occurring at the structural level with functional consequences. In this rare case study, we obtained the full network of white matter connections of one patient with Parkinson’s disease (PD) before and after long-term DBS and combined it with a computational model of ongoing activity to investigate the effects of DBS-induced long-term structural changes. The results show that the long-term effects of DBS on resting-state functional connectivity is best obtained in the computational model by changing the structural weights from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) to the putamen and the thalamus in a Hebbian-like manner. Moreover, long-term DBS also significantly changed the SC towards normality in terms of model-based measures of segregation and integration of information processing, two key concepts of brain organization. This novel approach using computational models to model the effects of Hebbian-like changes in SC allowed us to causally identify the possible underlying neural mechanisms of long-term DBS using rare case study data. In time, this could help predict the efficacy of individual DBS targeting and identify novel DBS targets.

[1]  G. Tononi,et al.  Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Neural Plasticity in Human Brain Connectivity: The Effects of Long Term Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson’s Disease , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Philip J. Hahn,et al.  Network perspectives on the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation , 2010, Neurobiology of Disease.

[4]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest , 2014, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  T. Aziz,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain. , 2022, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[6]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Balancing the Brain: Resting State Networks and Deep Brain Stimulation , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[7]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  Yang Wang,et al.  Characteristics and variability of structural networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Novel fingerprinting method characterises the necessary and sufficient structural connectivity from deep brain stimulation electrodes for a successful outcome , 2015 .

[10]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Resting brains never rest: computational insights into potential cognitive architectures , 2013, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[14]  Pierre-Louis Bazin,et al.  Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response , 2012, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Great Expectations: Using Whole-Brain Computational Connectomics for Understanding Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 2014, Neuron.

[16]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Structural connectivity in schizophrenia and its impact on the dynamics of spontaneous functional networks. , 2013, Chaos.

[17]  Morten L Kringelbach,et al.  Sing the mind electric – principles of deep brain stimulation , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Merello,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease , 2008 .

[20]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Murtaza Z Mogri,et al.  Optical Deconstruction of Parkinsonian Neural Circuitry , 2009, Science.

[22]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  A. Lozano,et al.  Probing and Regulating Dysfunctional Circuits Using Deep Brain Stimulation , 2013, Neuron.

[29]  B. Erwin,et al.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation and future technical developments , 2000, Neurological research.

[30]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Translational principles of deep brain stimulation , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Vitek Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: Excitation or inhibition , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.