Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic Tests of Reproductive Trait Evolution
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ramakant Sharma,et al. Phylogeny Estimation and Hypothesis Testing using Maximum Likelihood , 2003 .
[2] D. Swofford. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .
[3] Lifford,et al. Some Limitations of Ancestral Character-State Reconstruction When Testing Evolutionary Hypotheses , 2002 .
[4] P. Manos,et al. The Historical Biogeography of Fagaceae: Tracking the Tertiary History of Temperate and Subtropical Forests of the Northern Hemisphere , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[5] C. Cannon,et al. Combining and comparing morphometric shape descriptors with a molecular phylogeny: the case of fruit type evolution in Bornean Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). , 2001, Systematic biology.
[6] J. Rosselló,et al. Why nuclear ribosomal DNA spacers (ITS) tell different stories in Quercus. , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[7] E. M. Friis,et al. Normapolles flowers of fagalean affinity from the Late Cretaceous of Portugal , 2001, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[8] C. Schlötterer,et al. Three divergent rDNA clusters predate the species divergence in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.
[9] P. Manos,et al. Evolution, Phylogeny, and Systematics of the Juglandaceae , 2001 .
[11] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[12] J. Moncalvo,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[13] W. M. Whitten,et al. Phylogeny of the eudicots : a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences , 2000 .
[14] K. Nixon,et al. Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[15] P. Herendeen,et al. Fossil flowers with Normapolles pollen from the Upper Cretaceous of southeastern North America , 1999 .
[16] C. Cunningham. Some Limitations of Ancestral Character-State Reconstruction When Testing Evolutionary Hypotheses , 1999 .
[17] K. E. Omland. The Assumptions and Challenges of Ancestral State Reconstructions , 1999 .
[18] Jonathan Silvertown,et al. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF TRAIT EVOLUTION AND SPECIES DIVERSITY VARIATION AMONG ANGIOSPERM FAMILIES , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] S. Manchester. Biogeographical Relationships of North American Tertiary Floras , 1999 .
[20] M. Chase,et al. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and Their Allies: Parsimony Analyses of Nucleotide Sequences of the Plastid Gene rbcL , 1998, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[21] P. Herendeen,et al. New Genus of Fossil Fagaceae from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of Central Georgia, U. S. A. , 1998, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PLANT SCIENCES.
[22] David Posada,et al. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..
[23] K. Steele,et al. Phylogenetic analyses of "higher" Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. , 1997, American journal of botany.
[24] K. E. Omland. EXAMINING TWO STANDARD ASSUMPTIONS OF ANCESTRAL RECONSTRUCTIONS: REPEATED LOSS OF DICHROMATISM IN DABBLING DUCKS (ANATINI) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[25] R. Bacilieri,et al. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Thomas L. Madden,et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.
[27] R. Petit,et al. Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. , 1997, Genetics.
[28] Li Jian-qiang. On the Phylogeny of the Fagaceae , 1996 .
[29] Carol J. Bult,et al. Constructing a Significance Test for Incongruence , 1995 .
[30] P. Herendeen,et al. Fagaceous Flowers, Fruits, and Cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of Central Georgia, USA , 1995, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[31] J. Thompson,et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.
[32] S. Manchester. Fruits and seeds of the middle eocene nut beds flora Clarno Formation, Oregon , 1994 .
[33] N. Goldman,et al. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[34] K. Nixon,et al. Cladistic analysis of restriction site variation within the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat region of selected Hamamelididae , 1993 .
[35] J. Bousquet,et al. The rbcL gene sequence from chestnut indicates a slow rate of evolution in the Fagaceae. , 1993, Genome.
[36] K. Nixon. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names , 1993 .
[37] Larry Hufford,et al. Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons : a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data , 1992 .
[38] P. Cox. Abiotic pollination: an evolutionary escape for animal-pollinated angiosperms , 1991 .
[39] B. Schaal,et al. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[40] R. Hill,et al. A revised infrageneric classification of Nothofagus (Fagaceae) , 1991 .
[41] J. Farris. THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[42] K. Nixon,et al. EXTINCT TRANSITIONAL FAGACEAE FROM THE OLIGOCENE AND THEIR PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS , 1989 .
[43] K. Nixon,et al. TRIGONOBALANUS (FAGACEAE): TAXONOMIC STATUS AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS , 1989 .
[44] K. Nixon,et al. Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications , 1989 .
[45] Z. Kvaček,et al. Paleobotanical studies in Fagaceae of the European Tertiary , 1989 .
[46] M. Okamoto. NEW INTERPRETATION OF THE INFLORESCENCE OF FAGUS DRAWN FROM THE DEVELOPMENTAL STUDY OF FAGUS CRENATA, WITH DESCRIPTION OF AN EXTREMELY MONSTROUS CUPULE , 1989 .
[47] Charles M. Francis,et al. A field guide to the mammals of Borneo , 1987, Oryx.
[48] S. Manchester. The fossil history of the Juglandaceae , 1987 .
[49] Jay H. Jones. Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features , 1986 .
[50] R. Kaul. Reproductive morphology of Quercus (Fagaceae) , 1985 .
[51] E. Charnov,et al. ON IRREVERSIBLE EVOLUTION , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[52] J. Felsenstein. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[53] M. Vianey-Liaud. Possible Evolutionary Relationships among Eocene and Lower Oligocene Rodents of Asia, Europe and North America , 1985 .
[54] E. C. Abbe,et al. Inflorescence Architecture and Evolution in the Fagaceae , 1984, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum..
[55] E. M. Friis. Upper Cretaceous (Senonian) floral structures of juglandalean affinity containing normapolles pollen , 1983 .
[56] W. Crepet,et al. OAK CATKINS, LEAVES AND FRUITS FROM THE OLIGOCENE CATAHOULA FORMATION AND THEIR EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE' , 1983 .
[57] A. R. Templeton,et al. PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE FROM RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE CLEAVAGE SITE MAPS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANS AND THE APES , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[58] P. K. Endress,et al. Development and Morphological Interpretation of the Cupule in Fagaceae , 1983 .
[59] D. I. Axelrod. Biogeography of oaks in the Arcto-Tertiary Province , 1983 .
[60] W. Crepet,et al. CASTANEOID INFLORESCENCES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE OF TENNESSEE AND THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF POLLEN (AT THE SUBFAMILY LEVEL) IN THE FAGACEAE , 1980 .
[61] Alastair D. Macdonald. Inception of the cupule of Quercus macrocarpa and Fagus grandifolia , 1979 .
[62] C. G. Lozano,et al. Hallazgo del género Trigonobalanus forman, 1962 (Fagaceae) en el Neotrópico-II , 1979 .
[63] P. K. Endress. Evolutionary Trends in the Hamamelidales-Fagales-Group , 1977 .
[64] J. Farris. On Comparing the Shapes of Taxonomic Trees , 1973 .
[65] John G. Lundberg,et al. Wagner Networks and Ancestors , 1972 .
[66] D. Hou. CHROMOSOME NUMBERS OF TRIGONOBALANUS VERTICILLATA FORMAN (FAGACEAE) , 1971 .
[67] E. Soepadmo. FLORAE MALESIANE PRAECURSORES XLIX. MALESIAN SPECIES OF LITHOCARPUS BL(FAGACEAE) , 1970 .
[68] J. Farris,et al. Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans , 1969 .
[69] L. L. Forman. Generic delimitation in the Castaneoideae (Fagaceae) , 1966 .
[70] L. L. Forman. On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae , 1966 .
[71] G. Harris,et al. Regeneration from Leaf Squares of Peperomia sandersii A .DC: a Relationship between Rooting and Budding , 1964 .
[72] D. W. Brett. THE INFLORESCENCE OF FAGUS AND CASTANEA, AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE CUPULES OF THE FAGACEAE , 1964 .
[73] L. L. Forman. Trigonobalanus, a New Genus of Fagaceae, with Notes on the Classification of the Family , 1964 .
[74] E. C. B. D.Sc.. Keys to the Species Groups of Quercus, Lithocarpus, and Castanopsis of Eastern Asia, with Notes on their Distribution , 1944 .
[75] A. Camus. Lithocarpus Guinieri, Chêne nouveau du Cambodge , 1936 .
[76] E. Berridge. The Structure of the Flower of Fagaceae, and its Bearing on the Affinities of the Group , 1914 .