The Persistence of Lying

We study experimentally if lying is persistent. In a strategic game, we manipulate the incentives to lie to others. Some participants are first exposed to high incentives and then lower incentives; for others the reverse. We conjectured that participants will lie more often when the incentives are high, and will continue to lie when the incentives are then reduced. Contrary to our expectation, we do not find any such persistence in behavior, and there even seems to be an overcompensation effect: participants formerly exposed to high incentives are less likely to lie when confronted with lower incentives than participants who were never exposed to high incentives. The overcompensation is still present (but not statistically significant) after correcting for a general time trend.

[1]  Galena K. Rhoades,et al.  Once a Cheater, Always a Cheater? Serial Infidelity Across Subsequent Relationships , 2017, Archives of sexual behavior.

[2]  Agne Kajackaite,et al.  Incentives and cheating , 2017, Games Econ. Behav..

[3]  E. Fehr,et al.  The slippery slope of dishonesty , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Ariely,et al.  The Brain Adapts to Dishonesty , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Sutter,et al.  Insurance coverage of customers induces dishonesty of sellers in markets for credence goods , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Belot,et al.  How private is private information? The ability to spot deception in an economic game , 2014, Experimental Economics.

[7]  Alex Imas,et al.  Conscience Accounting: Emotion Dynamics and Social Behavior , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Grace Tang,et al.  White lies , 2012, Nature.

[9]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  The economics of credence goods : an experiment on the role of liability, verifiability, reputation and competition , 2011 .

[10]  Mark F. Owens,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Minimum Wage Restrictions and Employee Effort in Incomplete Labor Markets: an Experimental Investigation , 2022 .

[11]  M. Dufwenberg,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics Deception through Telling the Truth?! Experimental Evidence from Individuals and Teams Deception through Telling the Truth?! Experimental Evidence from Individuals and Teams , 2022 .

[12]  G. Charness,et al.  Incentives to Exercise , 2008 .

[13]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Fairness Perceptions and Reservation Wages—the Behavioral Effects of Minimum Wage Laws , 2006 .

[14]  Uri Gneezy,et al.  Deception: The Role of Consequences , 2005 .

[15]  J. Tirole,et al.  Incentives and Prosocial Behavior , 2004 .

[16]  K. Aquino,et al.  The self-importance of moral identity. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation crowding theory , 2001 .

[18]  James Konow,et al.  Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions , 2000 .

[19]  A. Rustichini,et al.  A Fine is a Price , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[20]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[21]  S. M. Arnsten.  Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[22]  E. Deci.  Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .