Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency

Abstract The interest in teachers’ discourses and vocabularies has for a long time been studied under the rubric of knowledge, most notably teachers’ professional knowledge. This interest can be traced back to Shulman’s distinction between different kinds of teacher knowledge and Schwab’s interest in the role of practical reasoning and judgement in teaching. Within the research, a distinction can be found between a more narrow approach that focuses on teachers’ propositional or theoretical knowledge and a more encompassing approach in which teachers’ knowledge is not only the knowledge for teachers generated elsewhere, but also the knowledge of teachers. This is the ‘stock of knowledge’ gained from a range of sources and experiences, including teachers’ ongoing engagement with the practice of teaching itself. In this paper, we focus on the role of teachers’ talk in their achievement of agency. We explore how, in what way and to what extent such talk helps or hinders teachers in exerting control over and giving direction to their everyday practices, bearing in mind that such practices are not just the outcome of teachers’ judgements and actions, but are also shaped by the structures and cultures within which teachers work.

[1]  Mark Priestley,et al.  Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach , 2015 .

[2]  Mark Priestley,et al.  The role of beliefs in teacher agency , 2015 .

[3]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future , 2015 .

[4]  David Wray,et al.  Teaching theory and practice , 2014 .

[5]  Gert Biesta,et al.  How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement , 2006 .

[6]  D. Clandinin,et al.  Teachers as Curriculum Planners. Narratives of Experience. , 1988 .

[7]  Mark Priestley,et al.  Teacher Agency : What Is It and Why Does It Matter? , 2015 .

[8]  Gary D. Fenstermacher The Knower and the Known: The Nature of Knowledge in Research on Teaching , 1994 .

[9]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[11]  G. Biesta WHY “WHAT WORKS” WON’T WORK: EVIDENCE‐BASED PRACTICE AND THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH , 2007 .

[12]  Joseph J. Schwab The practical: a language for curriculum , 2013 .

[13]  G. Biesta What is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism , 2015 .

[14]  S. Robinson,et al.  Teacher Agency, Performativity and Curriculum Change: Reinventing the Teacher in the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence? , 2012 .

[15]  Mustafa Emirbayer What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[16]  S. Robinson,et al.  The teacher and the curriculum: exploring teacher agency , 2016 .

[17]  Alison I. Griffith,et al.  Talk, texts, and educational action: an institutional ethnography of policy in practice , 2009 .

[18]  J. H. Driel,et al.  Teacher Knowledge and the Knowledge Base of Teaching , 2008, Science Teachers’ Knowledge Development.

[19]  S. Robinson,et al.  Teachers as agents of change: teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum , 2013 .

[20]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[21]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective , 2007 .

[22]  G. Biesta Knowledge, judgement and the curriculum: on the past, present and future of the idea of the Practical , 2013 .

[23]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[24]  M. Ben‐Peretz Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? , 2011 .

[25]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[26]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.