Vicarious function in the motor cortex A computational investigation

This paper presents a computational investigation of the vicarious function in the motor cortex (c/o the ability to reorganise its functioning by virtue of a shift of the lost function in the surrounding cortex which becomes able to vicariate). Several experimental studies in animals and humans have shown that motor recovery after partial destruction of the motor cortex is based on adjacent motor reorganisation. This study provides phenomenological evidence of this vicarious function. We tested the hypothesis according to which the vicarious function is possible because there is a synaptic rearrangement of the weights (which are comparable to the synapses of the brain) of the lesioned layer (unmasking of previous silent synapses hypothesis), and our results confirm this hypothesis. We argue that functional recovery is possible only when having bidirectional connections and that it is facilitated when non-M1 areas can guide the layer to relearn the lost movement.

[1]  M. Hommel,et al.  Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  P. Glees,et al.  RECOVERY OF SKILLED MOTOR FUNCTIONS AFTER SMALL REPEATED LESIONS OF MOTOR CORTEX IN MACAQUE , 1950 .

[3]  R. Nudo,et al.  Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  R. O’Reilly Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  J. Kleim,et al.  Synaptogenesis and dendritic growth in the cortex opposite unilateral sensorimotor cortex damage in adult rats: a quantitative electron microscopic examination , 1996, Brain Research.

[6]  François Chollet,et al.  Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[8]  S. Franz,et al.  On cerebral motor control: The recovery from experimentally produced hemiplegia. , 1917 .

[9]  Richard P. Cooper,et al.  A computational model of action resonance and its modulation by emotional stimulation , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[10]  L. G. Cohen,et al.  Nervous system reorganization following injury , 2002, Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[13]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  R. Nudo,et al.  Effects of Postlesion Experience on Behavioral Recovery and Neurophysiologic Reorganization after Cortical Injury in Primates , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Boltzmann Machines , 1985, Cogn. Sci..