Rapid detection of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels in blood: performance of various membrane strip tests compared.

OBJECTIVES To compare the ability of four commercially available membrane strip tests to detect increased (4 microg/L or more) concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in blood. METHODS Serum samples with PSA concentrations less than 4 microg/L (n = 67) and from greater than 4 microg/L to 20 microg/L (n = 32) were independently examined by two observers using the PSA membrane strip tests from Chembio, Medpro, Seratec, and Syntron. The positive and negative results of each membrane strip test were classified as either true positive or negative and false negative or positive by comparing them with the quantitative PSA assay of Immulite DPC using the conventional threshold value of 4 microg/L. RESULTS The interobserver variations of the tests were between 93% and 97%. The color stability of the Seratec and Chembio tests did not show significant differences between test results read within 10 to 20 minutes of the reaction time; however, the results of the other two tests were especially affected by variations in the reading time. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests in relation to the threshold of 4 microg/L were 67% to 93% and 87% to 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Syntron test and, within certain limitations, the Seratec test fulfill the concept of a rapid and convenient PSA determination to detect PSA concentrations greater than 4 microg/L. Methodologic optimization of the tests by a grading of the PSA measuring ranges (eg, between 0 and 2, 3 and 4, 4 and 6, and 7 and 10 microg/L) should be taken into account for future development.

[1]  P. Sieber,et al.  The use of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a community based urology practice. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  D. Ornstein,et al.  Biological variation of total, free and percent free serum prostate specific antigen levels in screening volunteers. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[4]  T. Stamey,et al.  Physiological variation of serum prostate specific antigen in the 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml. range in male volunteers. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[5]  S. Loening,et al.  Analytical performance and clinical validity of two free prostate-specific antigen assays compared. , 1996, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  H. C. Graves,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen comes of age in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. , 1992, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  A. Kallner,et al.  Guidelines for evaluation of reagent strips. Exemplified by analysis of urine albumin and glucose concentration using visually read reagent strips: Ifcc Document , 1989 .

[8]  A. Semjonow,et al.  Impact of free prostate-specific antigen on discordant measurement results of assays for total prostate-specific antigen. , 1996, Urology.

[9]  S. Loening,et al.  Strip test for the quick detection of increased concentrations of prostate-specific antigen in blood. , 1996, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[10]  K. Alberti,et al.  Micral-test strips evaluated for screening for albuminuria. , 1992, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[12]  T. Stamey Some comments on progress in the standardization of immunoassays for prostate-specific antigen. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[13]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Evaluation of determination of glucose in urine with some commercially available dipsticks and tablets. , 1982, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  V Kairisto,et al.  Software for illustrative presentation of basic clinical characteristics of laboratory tests--GraphROC for Windows. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.