How Do I Remember That I Know You Know That I Know?

Communication is aided greatly when speakers and listeners take advantage of mutually shared knowledge (i.e., common ground). How such information is represented in memory is not well known. Using a neuropsychological-psycholinguistic approach to real-time language understanding, we investigated the ability to form and use common ground during conversation in memory-impaired participants with hippocampal amnesia. Analyses of amnesics’ eye fixations as they interpreted their partner’s utterances about a set of objects demonstrated successful use of common ground when the amnesics had immediate access to common-ground information, but dramatic failures when they did not. These findings indicate a clear role for declarative memory in maintenance of common-ground representations. Even when amnesics were successful, however, the eye movement record revealed subtle deficits in resolving potential ambiguity among competing intended referents; this finding suggests that declarative memory may be critical to more basic aspects of the on-line resolution of linguistic ambiguity.

[1]  David E. Warren,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[2]  Timothy S. Paek,et al.  Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension , 1998 .

[3]  D. Ballard,et al.  Memory Representations in Natural Tasks , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[5]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[6]  Neal J. Cohen,et al.  The Long and the Short of It: Relational Memory Impairments in Amnesia, Even at Short Lags , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation , 2008, Cognition.

[8]  Assertion , 2008, Practices of Reason.

[9]  N. Cohen.  From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection Memory Systems of the Brain. Oxford Psychology Series, Volume 35. , 2001 .

[10]  R. Gerrig,et al.  The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production , 2005, Cognition.

[11]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[13]  J. Hodges.  Memory, Amnesia and the Hippocampal System , 1995 .

[14]  S. Brennan,et al.  When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions , 2003 .

[15]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[16]  Catherine Marshall,et al.  Reference Diaries , 1978, TINLAP.

[17]  Neal J Cohen,et al.  Development of shared information in communication despite hippocampal amnesia , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[19]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[20]  M. Pickering,et al.  The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[22]  Julie A. Hengst,et al.  The Use of Definite References Signals Declarative Memory , 2011, Psychological science.

[23]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Coordinating beliefs in conversation , 1992 .

[24]  B. Rossion,et al.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.

[25]  D. Barr.  Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[26]  G. Altmann.  Ambiguity in sentence processing , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  E. Marshall,et al.  NIMH: caught in the line of fire without a general , 1995, Science.

[28]  Shali Wu,et al.  The Effect of Information Overlap on Communication Effectiveness , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  H.M.'s Language Production Deficits: Implications for Relations between Memory, Semantic Binding, and the Hippocampal System ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1998 .

[30]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[31]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference , 2008, Cognition.

[32]  H. H. Clark.  Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[33]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition , 2008 .

[34]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Real-Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game Approach , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[36]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection , 2001 .

[37]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Wechsler Memory Scale–Third Edition , 2008 .

[38]  G. Gazdar,et al.  Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics: Peter Cole, ed., New York: Academic Press. 1978. pp. xii + 340. , 1980 .

[39]  Morgan D. Barense,et al.  The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  William S. Horton,et al.  Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production , 2005 .

[41]  Neal J Cohen,et al.  Talking across time: Using reported speech as a communicative resource in amnesia , 2007, Aphasiology.

[42]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation , 2003 .