Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.

Risk assessment for preterm delivery remains difficult, particularly among women with no prior history of preterm birth. We hypothesized that accurate assessment of cervical length by endovaginal ultrasonography could predict preterm delivery risk. A total of 178 patients with singleton gestations and without cervical incompetence were studied with transabdominal ultrasonography and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurement and manual vaginal examination of cervical length. A total of 113 patients who were evaluated by 30 weeks' gestation (excluding four induced preterm deliveries) were analyzed. Preterm delivery risk was compared between women with cervical lengths equal to or greater than the median and those with cervical lengths less than the median. An endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement less than 39 mm was associated with a significantly increased risk of preterm delivery (25.0% versus 6.7%) and detected 76% of preterm births. Manual examination of cervical effacement detected 71% of preterm births, but transabdominal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length was not preditive. Endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement predicted increased preterm delivery risk regardless of parity or obstetric history. Endovaginal ultrasonography is a promising method for the prediction of risk of preterm birth. Because it has the potential to be an objective measure of cervical length, endovaginal ultrasonography may be superior to manual digital examination for preterm delivery risk assessment.

[1]  F. Schaffner,et al.  Cervical Dilatation in the Early Third Trimester , 1966, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  H. Zakut,et al.  ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL INCOMPETENCE IN PREGNANCY—A NEW DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH , 1981, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  Floyd Ws.  Cervical dilatation in the mid-trimester of pregnancy. , 1961 .

[4]  M G Ross,et al.  A Simplified Risk-Scoring System for Prematurity , 1986, American journal of perinatology.

[5]  N. Gleicher,et al.  Pitfalls in Sonographic Imaging of the Incompetent Uterine Cervix , 1986, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  E. Mueller-Heubach,et al.  Evaluation of risk scoring in a preterm birth prevention study of indigent patients. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  D. Main,et al.  Intermittent Weekly Contraction Monitoring to Predict Preterm Labor in Low-Risk Women: A Blinded Study , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Ajit C Mehta,et al.  INTERNAL CERVICAL OS DURING THE SECOND HALF OF PREGNANCY , 1961, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire.

[9]  Creasy Rk,et al.  System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. , 1980 .

[10]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. I. A study of the frequency of 30 predictive characteristics , 1974, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[11]  T. Varma,et al.  Ultrasonic Assessment of Cervix in Normal Pregnancy , 1986, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  J. Fedrick.  ANTENATAL IDENTIFICATION OF WOMEN AT HIGH RISK OF SPONTANEOUS PRE‐TERM BIRTH , 1976, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  M. Podobnik,et al.  Ultrasonography in the detection of cervical incompetency , 1988, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[14]  S. Zemlyn.  The length of the uterine cervix and its significance , 1981, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[15]  K. Leveno,et al.  Cervical dilatation and prematurity revisited , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  S. Zemlyn.  The effect of the urinary bladder in obstetrical sonography. , 1978, Radiology.

[17]  A. Compton,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancy: diagnosis and management of preterm cervical effacement in patients at risk for premature delivery. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  J. Bowie,et al.  Sonographic appearance of the uterine cervix in pregnancy: the vertical cervix. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  T. Stubbs,et al.  The preterm cervix and preterm labor: relative risks, predictive values, and change over time. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  C. Crowther,et al.  Preterm Labor in Twin Pregnancies: Prediction by Cervical Assessment , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  J. Bouyer,et al.  Precocious cervical ripening and preterm labor. , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  A. Kivikoski,et al.  The Incompetent Cervix During Pregnancy Diagnosed by Ultrasound , 1983, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[23]  S. Weller,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of a Risk Scoring System for Predicting Preterm Delivery in Black Inner City Women , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  T. Varma,et al.  Ultrasonic Assessment of Cervix in “At Risk” Patients , 1986, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.