Network spandrels reflect ecological assembly.

Ecological networks that exhibit stable dynamics should theoretically persist longer than those that fluctuate wildly. Thus, network structures which are over-represented in natural systems are often hypothesised to be either a cause or consequence of ecological stability. Rarely considered, however, is that these network structures can also be by-products of the processes that determine how new species attempt to join the community. Using a simulation approach in tandem with key results from random matrix theory, we illustrate how historical assembly mechanisms alter the structure of ecological networks. We demonstrate that different community assembly scenarios can lead to the emergence of structures that are often interpreted as evidence of 'selection for stability'. However, by controlling for the underlying selection pressures, we show that these assembly artefacts-or spandrels-are completely unrelated to stability or selection, and are instead by-products of how new species are introduced into the system. We propose that these network-assembly spandrels are critically overlooked aspects of network theory and stability analysis, and we illustrate how a failure to adequately account for historical assembly can lead to incorrect inference about the causes and consequences of ecological stability.

[1]  Michael Lässig,et al.  Biodiversity in model ecosystems, II: species assembly and food web structure. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  James A. Drake,et al.  The mechanics of community assembly and succession , 1990 .

[4]  Thomas Lenormand,et al.  Gene flow and the limits to natural selection , 2002 .

[5]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  Concepción L. Alados,et al.  Evidence of structural balance in spatial ecological networks , 2017 .

[7]  Sebastian J Schreiber,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity promotes coexistence of rock-paper-scissors metacommunities. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Andrew M Hein,et al.  The dynamics of assembling food webs. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[9]  Angelo Monteiro,et al.  The interplay between population stability and food-web topology predicts the occurrence of motifs in complex food-webs. , 2016, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Fukami,et al.  Immigration history controls diversification in experimental adaptive radiation , 2007, Nature.

[13]  R. Law Theoretical Aspects of Community Assembly , 2009 .

[14]  R. Solé,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of modularity in cellular networks , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  Peter B Adler,et al.  The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[16]  T. Reichenbach,et al.  Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games , 2007, Nature.

[17]  V. Marčenko,et al.  DISTRIBUTION OF EIGENVALUES FOR SOME SETS OF RANDOM MATRICES , 1967 .

[18]  Marta Sales-Pardo,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Species’ Roles in Food Webs , 2012, Science.

[19]  Sergi Valverde,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks as an evolutionary spandrel , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[20]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks , 2013, Nature Communications.

[21]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Sergey Gavrilets,et al.  Dynamic patterns of adaptive radiation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  W. Post,et al.  Community assembly and food web stability , 1983 .

[24]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  Patrick Forber,et al.  Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence , 2009 .

[26]  R. Macarthur Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[28]  Peter J. Taylor,et al.  The construction and turnover of complex community models having Generalized Lotka-Volterra dynamics , 1988 .

[29]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Modularity and stability in ecological communities , 2016, Nature Communications.

[30]  E. Wigner On the Distribution of the Roots of Certain Symmetric Matrices , 1958 .

[31]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Selection on stability across ecological scales. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  COEVOLUTION AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  Richard Law,et al.  Regional Species Pools and the Assembly of Local Ecological Communities , 1997 .

[35]  Jonathan J. Borrelli Selection against instability: stable subgraphs are most frequent in empirical food webs , 2015 .

[36]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Predicting the stability of large structured food webs , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  Alan J. McKane,et al.  Comparison of food webs constructed by evolution and by immigration , 2009 .

[38]  A. Maritan,et al.  Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks , 2013, Nature.

[39]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Environmental variability counteracts priority effects to facilitate species coexistence: evidence from nectar microbes , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Nadav M Shnerb,et al.  Emergence of structured communities through evolutionary dynamics. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  B. Goh Global Stability in Many-Species Systems , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[42]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[43]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[44]  Nathaniel Virgo,et al.  Sequentially assembled food webs and extremum principles in ecosystem ecology. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[45]  José A Capitán,et al.  Statistical mechanics of ecosystem assembly. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[46]  Yuya Ito,et al.  Corrigendum: Mutations in CDCA7 and HELLS cause immunodeficiency–centromeric instability–facial anomalies syndrome , 2016, Nature Communications.

[47]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion : new questions from old patterns , 1995 .

[48]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  On the structural stability of mutualistic systems , 2014, Science.

[49]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The stability–complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective , 2015, Population Ecology.

[50]  Daniel S Maynard,et al.  Diversity begets diversity in competition for space , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[51]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Patterns of species interaction strength in assembled theoretical competition communities , 1999 .

[52]  Lauren C. Ponisio,et al.  Coevolution leaves a weak signal on ecological networks , 2017 .

[53]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Gene duplication models for directed networks with limits on growth , 2007 .

[54]  Joseph A. Veech,et al.  The pairwise approach to analysing species co‐occurrence , 2014 .

[55]  R. Solé,et al.  Are network motifs the spandrels of cellular complexity? , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[57]  James D. Bever,et al.  Coexistence under positive frequency dependence , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Francesco de Bello,et al.  The quest for trait convergence and divergence in community assembly: are null‐models the magic wand? , 2012 .

[59]  Hewitt,et al.  Colonization and diversification: towards a phylogeographic synthesis for the Canary Islands. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The Effect of Intra- and Interspecific Competition on Coexistence in Multispecies Communities , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[61]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  T. Price,et al.  Adaptive radiation, nonadaptive radiation, ecological speciation and nonecological speciation. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network Organization , 2005, PLoS biology.

[64]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[65]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states? , 2011, Ecology letters.

[66]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Evolution and Coevolution in Mutualistic Networks , 2022 .