Analyzing the effects of excess rainfall properties on the scaling structure of peak discharges: Insights from a mesoscale river basin

Key theoretical and empirical results from the past two decades have established that peak discharges resulting from a single rainfall-runoff event in a nested watershed exhibit a power law, or scaling, relation to drainage area and that the parameters of the power law relation, henceforth referred to as the flood scaling exponent and intercept, change from event to event. To date, only two studies have been conducted using empirical data, both using data from the 21 km2 Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed that is located in Mississippi, in an effort to uncover the physical processes that control the event-to-event variability of the flood scaling parameters. Our study expands the analysis to the mesoscale Iowa River basin (A = 32,400 km2), which is located in eastern Iowa, and provides additional insights into the physical processes that control the flood scaling parameters. Using 51 rainfall-runoff events that we identified over the 12 year period since 2002, we show how the duration and depth of excess rainfall, which is the portion of rainfall that contributes to direct runoff, control the flood scaling exponent and intercept. Moreover, using a diagnostic simulation study that is guided by evidence found in empirical data, we show that the temporal structure of excess rainfall has a significant effect on the scaling structure of peak discharges. These insights will contribute toward ongoing efforts to provide a framework for flood prediction in ungauged basins.

[1]  A. V. Vecchia,et al.  Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate , 2005, Nature.

[2]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[3]  F. Ogden,et al.  Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed , 2003 .

[4]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Examining Flood Frequency Distributions in the Midwest U.S. 1 , 2011 .

[5]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[6]  J. Faraway Linear Models with R , 2014 .

[7]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria , 2009 .

[8]  Ricardo Mantilla,et al.  Scaling of peak flows with constant flow velocity in random self-similar networks , 2010 .

[9]  Younes Alila,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities in a hillslope with lateral preferential flow , 2009 .

[10]  Ricardo Mantilla Physical basis of statistical scaling in peak flows and stream flow hydrographs for topologic and spatially embedded random self-similiar channel networks , 2007 .

[11]  R. Mantilla,et al.  Insights into Expected Changes in Regulated Flood Frequencies due to the Spatial Configuration of Flood Retention Ponds , 2015 .

[12]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Regional Skew with Weighted LS Regression , 1986 .

[13]  G. Villarini,et al.  On the stationarity of annual flood peaks in the continental United States during the 20th century , 2009 .

[14]  C. Mutel A Watershed Year: Anatomy of the Iowa Floods of 2008 , 2010 .

[15]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Process controls on regional flood frequency: Coefficient of variation and basin scale , 1997 .

[16]  C. H. Hardison,et al.  Generalized skew coefficients of annual floods in the United States and their application , 1974 .

[17]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Extreme Flood Response: The June 2008 Flooding in Iowa , 2013 .

[18]  V. Gupta,et al.  Diagnosing peak-discharge power laws observed in rainfall–runoff events in Goodwin Creek experimental watershed , 2007 .

[19]  R. Mantilla,et al.  Exploring the effects of hillslope-channel link dynamics and excess rainfall properties on the scaling structure of peak-discharge , 2014 .

[20]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review , 2013 .

[21]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients , 2006 .

[22]  V. Gupta,et al.  Regional Flood-Frequency Analysis: How We Got Here and Where We Are Going , 2012 .

[23]  J. Smith,et al.  Scaling Properties of Flood Peaks , 2001 .

[24]  David R. Dawdy,et al.  Physical interpretations of regional variations in the scaling exponents of flood quantiles , 1995 .

[25]  Oscar J. Mesa,et al.  Role of coupled flow dynamics and real network structures on Hortonian scaling of peak flows , 2006 .

[26]  R. Mantilla,et al.  Impact of radar‐rainfall error structure on estimated flood magnitude across scales: An investigation based on a parsimonious distributed hydrological model , 2012 .

[27]  Mark F. Roth,et al.  Changes in historical Iowa land cover as context for assessing the environmental benefits of current and future conservation efforts on agricultural lands , 2011, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[28]  David A. Eash Techniques for estimating flood-frequency discharges for streams in Iowa , 2001 .

[29]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Connecting the power-law scaling structure of peak-discharges to spatially variable rainfall and catchment physical properties , 2014 .

[30]  J. Smith,et al.  Representation of basin scale in flood peak distributions , 1992 .

[31]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  Rectangular pulses point process models for rainfall: Analysis of empirical data , 1987 .

[32]  L. Cunha Exploring the benefits of satellite remote sensing for flood prediction across scales , 2012 .

[33]  Mohamed M. Hantush,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling of an Eastern Pennsylvania Watershed with NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Data , 2006 .

[34]  M. A. Benson,et al.  Factors influencing the occurrence of floods in a humid region of diverse terrain , 1963 .

[35]  R. Mantilla,et al.  Generalizing a nonlinear geophysical flood theory to medium‐sized river networks , 2010 .

[36]  G. Villarini,et al.  Flood peak distributions for the eastern United States , 2009 .

[37]  David R. Dawdy,et al.  Towards a Nonlinear Geophysical Theory of Floods in River Networks: An Overview of 20 Years of Progress , 2007 .

[38]  G. Villarini,et al.  Product-Error-Driven Uncertainty Model for Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation with NEXRAD Data , 2007 .

[39]  V. Gupta,et al.  Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology: Spatial Variability and Scale Invariance in Hydrologic Regionalization , 1998 .

[40]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Linking space–time variability of river runoff and rainfall fields: a dynamic approach , 2001 .

[41]  E. Volpi,et al.  Effects of hillslope dynamics and network geometry on the scaling properties of the hydrologic response , 2011 .

[42]  J. Stedinger,et al.  Getting From Here to Where? Flood Frequency Analysis and Climate 1 , 2011 .

[43]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Process controls on the statistical flood moments ‐ a data based analysis , 2009 .

[44]  V. Gupta,et al.  Emergence of statistical scaling in floods on channel networks from complex runoff dynamics , 2004 .

[45]  Christian Onof,et al.  Point process models of rainfall: developments for fine-scale structure , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[46]  Philip W. Gassman,et al.  Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions , 2008 .

[47]  Gerald E. Galloway,et al.  If Stationarity is Dead, What Do We Do Now? 1 , 2011 .

[48]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Linking flood frequency to long‐term water balance: Incorporating effects of seasonality , 2005 .

[49]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Flow time estimation with spatially variable hillslope velocity in ungauged basins , 2010 .

[50]  Vijay K. Gupta,et al.  A GIS numerical framework to study the process basis of scaling statistics in river networks , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[51]  R. Merz,et al.  A process typology of regional floods , 2003 .

[52]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Review of the Different Sources of Uncertainty in Single Polarization Radar-Based Estimates of Rainfall , 2010 .

[53]  Tests of peak flow scaling in simulated self-similar river networks , 2001 .

[54]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Hydro-Climatological Trends in the Continental United States, 1948-88 , 1994 .

[55]  R. Mantilla,et al.  Dissecting the effect of rainfall variability on the statistical structure of peak flows , 2009 .

[56]  M. A. Benson,et al.  Uniform Flood-Frequency Estimating Methods for Federal Agencies , 1968 .

[57]  Thomas M. Over,et al.  On scaling exponents of spatial peak flows from rainfall and river network geometry , 1996 .

[58]  Feng Ding,et al.  Radar and Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Techniques in National Weather Service Hydrologic Operations , 2013 .

[59]  G. Villarini,et al.  The hydrology and hydrometeorology of flooding in the Delaware River basin. , 2010 .

[60]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Time of concentration: a paradox in modern hydrology , 2012 .

[61]  V. Gupta,et al.  Effects of excess rainfall on the temporal variability of observed peak-discharge power laws , 2005 .